Zimbabwe draft constitution: an elitist deception
2012 July 27 19:56:58 | 1760 Views
- Ingabe ikuphatheleni i-MDC, njalo kusizani ukuyivotela? | 2013 May 13 17:03:55 | 3101 views
- Ikuphatheleni iMDC, kusiza ngani ukuyivotela? | 2013 May 08 19:28:47 | 2875 views
- MDC-T on course | 2013 March 27 14:05:12 | 6789 views
- People will vote for a party with sustainable economic programmes | 2013 March 04 02:36:52 | 7604 views
- Introducing: Election (2013) campaign articles | 2013 March 02 11:08:41 | 6135 views
- Congratulations Zimbabwe on new constitution | 2013 May 23 17:04:31
- New Constitution now law of the land; let's finish it Zimbabwe | 2013 May 22 16:59:12
- Mugabe has signed constitution into law | 2013 May 22 16:03:58
- Mugabe to sign new Constitution into law today | 2013 May 22 06:25:08
- Prophet Uebert Angel upsets T.B Joshua's followers | 2013 February 24 10:20:20 | 41224 views
- Prophet T.B. Joshua's prophecies for 2013 | 2013 January 01 12:26:15 | 21432 views
- Obama's wife is a Zimbabwean! | 2013 April 01 12:51:57 | 20751 views
- 'If anyone was defending Nkomo, it was I. I was the last to leave Zapu,' says Mugabe | 2013 February 19 15:02:19 | 11324 views
- Mpofu and SK Moyo up for Presidency | 2013 January 17 16:37:36 | 11140 views
It is a document that can no longer take my views into account, no matter how many times academics or political gladiators defend or disparage it. I am also aware that some colleagues in civil society are under tremendous pressure to defend it, warts and all, as a 'better than before' document, and sure enough they will be convening various public meetings to discuss the document's content from a legal perspective.
The politics of the document will be conveniently forgotten and an initially silent campaign to seek to persuade Zimbabweans to vote 'yes' to the draft is most definitely underway, even though its final content is yet to be approved by the principals of the inclusive government. Not that such approval makes the document any more democratic. It just simply means this draft constitution is imbued with the personalities and politics of President Robert Mugabe, Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Mutambara and Industry Minister Welshman Ncube.
Even the COPAC management committee together with its select committee cannot do anything else to this document. They have haggled, had numerous workshops and spent over US$20 million (another figure made public has been US$45million) on a draft whose final contents will be determined by just four individuals.
But that is not the essential point, even though it makes one wonder, where the COPAC chairpersons get the wherewithal to still claim to have been running a 'people-centred' constitutional reform process.
The key issue is that for all our analysis of the COPAC draft, it is a document that can only now be changed by four individuals. To seek to claim that it is a better document by way of legal analysis and to have Zimbabweans support is an exercise in political hypocrisy.
The reality is that to all intents and purposes, even without reading the draft, the political processes that have informed this document are very similar to those that led to the first Kariba Draft. In fact, this new draft should merely be referred to as the Kariba 2 document because the politicians that wrote the first version are the players that are now in charge of the second version.
If anyone wants to change the content of the draft, they would be well advised to simply make a beeline to the offices of the President, Prime Minister and the other two ministers.
A second element that points to the hypocrisy of our politicians has been their intention to conveniently forget the monumental disaster that has been COPAC itself. From its beginning to present day, COPAC has failed to demonstrate the requisite seriousness that is normally reserved for processes as important as the drafting of a national constitution.
Against better advice, it ignored its own outreach findings, sidelined civil society and spent lavishly on hotels and conferences for things and issues which it, in the final analysis, has not even seriously considered. Even if its mandate was patently undemocratic, it failed to meet the requirements of performance criteria it had set for itself.
Thirdly, the fact that the conversations around constitutional reform have shifted to content does not make the process any more democratic. To argue about the content pre supposes that it can be changed. Alternatively, to debate the content can also be taken to mean indirect approval of the document and therefore, to be a willing player in an undemocratically arrived at draft constitution.
The truth of the matter is that the Kariba 2 draft constitution is not going to undergo any major changes, and even if it does, those changes will not be coming from civil society but the four principals in government. Added to this is that the defence of the document that has begun to be undertaken by some colleagues in civil society means that they are already campaigning for a 'yes' vote for a draft constitution that was arrived at undemocratically. And they are probably doing this under pressure from the MDCs who keep arguing wrongly that the 2000 'no vote' was a mistake, yet it was a democratic verdict of the peopleâ€™s wishes.
These colleagues in civil society and in the MDCs would be well advised that constitutions are not written merely for the removal of individuals from power, they are intended for democratic governance. To want to mix up issues of how to get rid of Zanu PF from power with the constitution making process even at this late stage, is to deliberately deceive the people of Zimbabwe. But then again, the whole COPAC process and the attendant civil society support for it, has been an exercise in elitist political deception.
Finally, I am aware that there is an assumption that it is the political principals that will be able to get Zimbabweans to vote yes to the draft and that anyone else campaigning for a 'no vote' will most certainly lose. This would be a fair analysis were it not for the fact that the people of Zimbabwe do not have a limited understanding of constitutional reform issues.
I am certain that even with all the cajoling and the politicised 'yes' vote campaigns that will follow, a significant number will register their displeasure with the great deception that has been COPAC.
Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity (takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
Moyo Roy | 2013 May 23 | 1106 Views
Staff Reporter | 2013 May 23 | 567 Views
Staff Reporter | 2013 May 23 | 627 Views
Nomalanga Moyo | 2013 May 23 | 210 Views
Staff Reporter | 2013 May 23 | 1058 Views
Mkhululi Mthunzi | 2013 May 23 | 830 Views
Ndou Paul | 2013 May 23 | 1611 Views
Soccer Laduma | 2013 May 23 | 1066 Views
Financial Express | 2013 May 23 | 1108 Views
Velempini Ndlovu | 2013 May 23 | 1364 Views
ZUPA Team. | 2013 May 23 | 988 Views
Moyo Roy | 2013 May 23 | 3768 Views
Business reporter | 2013 May 23 | 814 Views
Vince Musewe | 2013 May 23 | 1069 Views
Sapa | 2013 May 23 | 2181 Views
Sapa | 2013 May 23 | 2465 Views
AFP | 2013 May 23 | 2012 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 3613 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 3839 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 4051 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 3294 Views
Njabulo Ncube | 2013 May 23 | 3405 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 4055 Views
Gordon Rayner and Steven Swinford | 2013 May 23 | 2355 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 2547 Views
BangShowBiz | 2013 May 23 | 1718 Views
Moyo Roy | 2013 May 23 | 812 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 23 | 1107 Views
Blessing Ivan Vava | 2013 May 21 | 1894 Views
Staff reporter | 2013 May 21 | 4622 Views
Moyo Roy | 2013 May 20 | 5894 Views
TMZ | 2013 May 20 | 2432 Views
Emmanuel Ndlovu | 2013 May 18 | 2300 Views