Opinion / Columnist
Ballots and Bullets: The Struggle for Democracy in Africa
20 Feb 2025 at 08:34hrs | Views
Since the wave of independence that swept across Africa in the 1960s, the promise of democracy has remained elusive for much of the continent. The dream of democratic governance, where leaders are accountable to the people, where human rights are respected, and where institutions function to serve citizens, has often been undermined by political instability, corruption, and military rule. Africa's struggle between ballots and bullets continues to define the political landscape, raising critical questions about the future of democracy on the continent. Why has democracy failed to take root in many African nations, and why do so many African citizens still find themselves caught between choosing the ballot or the bullet as a means of securing their future?
Kwame Nkrumah, one of the most influential Pan-Africanists and the first president of Ghana, once boldly declared, "The independence of Ghana is meaningless unless it is linked up with the total liberation of Africa." Nkrumah's vision was clear that African independence was the first step, but true liberation could only be achieved through democratic governance, the rule of law, and collective prosperity. Yet, as we look across the continent today, the reality is far from Nkrumah's aspirations. While Africa has witnessed more democratic transitions in recent decades, elections have often become contested events, with leaders manipulating the system to retain power, and military coups undermining the democratic process. What went wrong?
In countries like Zimbabwe the painful reality is that he ballot is becoming increasingly irrelevant. Under Robert Mugabe, who ruled Zimbabwe for 37 years, elections were marred by violence, intimidation, and electoral fraud. While Mugabe's government claimed legitimacy through the ballot, the people's will was often disregarded in favor of maintaining political control. The 2008 presidential election in Zimbabwe serves as a chilling example, with Mugabe's regime resorting to violence to suppress opposition, leading to widespread claims of vote rigging. The tragic irony was that Mugabe, once a liberation hero, had become a symbol of tyranny, showing how the ballot can be hijacked by those who seek power at any cost. If the ballot is compromised by fraud and violence, can democracy still be said to exist?
More recently, in Uganda, President Yoweri Museveni, who has been in power since 1986, has relied on similar tactics to secure his hold on power. His government has repeatedly altered the constitution to remove term limits and amended laws to prevent opposition candidates from challenging him. In 2021, Museveni claimed victory in a highly contested election, which was widely criticized for its lack of transparency and the violent suppression of opposition candidates. The Ugandan government's manipulation of democratic processes has raised alarm, prompting critics to ask: How can a leader who refuses to relinquish power maintain any semblance of legitimacy through elections?
But what happens when the ballot fails, and the bullet becomes the only option for change? The answer to that question has played out on numerous occasions in Africa's recent history. From Mali to Burkina Faso, from Guinea to Chad, military coups have become a disturbing pattern, undermining democratic institutions and eroding the progress made toward civilian rule. In Mali, the military overthrew President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita in August 2020, citing corruption, mismanagement, and the government's failure to address security concerns posed by Islamist insurgencies. The coup was met with widespread support among ordinary Malians, who saw the military as their only hope for ending corruption and restoring stability. In Burkina Faso, soldiers ousted President Roch Marc Christian Kaboré in January 2022, citing similar concerns over his handling of the jihadist insurgency. The question here is whether military rule is the solution when democracy falters, or if it only perpetuates a cycle of instability. Can the military, which is supposed to serve the people, really be the savior when the very systems it upholds are corrupt and inept?
Across the Sahel region, military takeovers have been justified with the promise of restoring order and combating terrorism. However, history has shown that military governments often fail to deliver on their promises. The hope that soldiers would improve governance, tackle corruption, and strengthen democratic institutions often gives way to authoritarianism and human rights abuses. In Guinea, for instance, the 2021 coup led by Colonel Mamady Doumbouya initially promised to restore order and establish a transition to democracy. Yet, as time passes, it becomes apparent that military regimes struggle to govern effectively without the political legitimacy provided by democratic institutions. Are the military's promises of reform simply empty rhetoric, or do they reflect a deeper failure of civilian leaders to provide for the people?
What, then, is the future of democracy in Africa? The question remains an open one, and there is no easy answer. On the one hand, democracy is undeniably fragile across much of Africa. Electoral processes continue to be undermined by corruption, violence, and authoritarianism. In some countries, such as Tanzania, Malawi, and Zambia, elections have shown positive signs of democratic maturity, but these examples remain the exception rather than the rule. In these countries, the ballots seem to hold genuine meaning, and the results reflect the people's will. But these positive examples raise a critical question: what are the conditions that make democracy succeed in some countries but fail in others?
On the other hand, the growing frequency of military coups presents a disturbing trend. The more military interventions that occur, the more it becomes clear that Africa's experiment with democracy is still in its infancy. As long as leaders remain unwilling to relinquish power and as long as democratic institutions are weak, the continent will continue to struggle with the balance between ballots and bullets. Africa's political systems need to evolve to prioritize the protection of democratic processes, the rule of law, and human rights. But this cannot happen in isolation. African leaders must look beyond their borders for solutions, engaging in regional cooperation and reform to strengthen the continent's commitment to democracy.
The African Union (AU) and regional organizations like ECOWAS play a crucial role in promoting democratic governance and holding leaders accountable. Yet, these organizations have often been criticized for their inability to effectively intervene when democracy is under threat. The AU's response to the recent coups in Mali, Guinea, and Burkina Faso has been muted, often choosing diplomatic pressure over direct intervention. If Africa is to ensure the survival of democracy, its institutions must become more robust in addressing violations of democratic principles and holding leaders accountable. At the same time, African citizens must demand greater transparency, accountability, and the protection of their rights.
Kwame Nkrumah once said, "We must unite and form a United States of Africa." While Nkrumah's vision of a united continent has yet to be realized, his words still resonate today. A more united Africa, with strong democratic institutions, could help combat the rising tide of military interventions. The idea of African unity is not just about economic cooperation, but about creating a political environment where democracy can thrive. Unity, in this sense, means not only economic partnerships but also political solidarity to defend democratic norms and values. The African Union, as well as regional blocs like ECOWAS, must play a more active role in fostering democratic governance, providing a clear alternative to the destructive cycle of military rule.
However, the question remains: how can Africa's leaders break free from the colonial legacy of weak institutions and corrupt political systems? How can the continent rebuild trust in democratic processes when many citizens feel disillusioned by corrupt politicians and ineffective governments? The answer, it seems, lies in fostering a culture of democratic participation, where citizens are not mere subjects of authoritarian rule but active participants in shaping their future. Only when the people believe in the power of the ballot and when their leaders believe in the power of the people will democracy take root.
Africa's struggle for democracy is far from over. It is a battle fought not only in the corridors of power but in the hearts and minds of ordinary citizens. The ballot, when respected and free from manipulation, remains the most powerful tool for change. But for Africa to truly be free, its leaders must learn to serve the people, rather than rule over them. As Nkrumah wisely said, "Seek ye first the political kingdom, and all things will be added unto you." Africa's path to democracy may be long, but it is a path worth walking, one that demands the active participation of both leaders and citizens alike. The question now is whether Africa is ready to make that journey.
Vanessa Chisi is an undergraduate student at Africa University and she writes this in her personal capacity
Kwame Nkrumah, one of the most influential Pan-Africanists and the first president of Ghana, once boldly declared, "The independence of Ghana is meaningless unless it is linked up with the total liberation of Africa." Nkrumah's vision was clear that African independence was the first step, but true liberation could only be achieved through democratic governance, the rule of law, and collective prosperity. Yet, as we look across the continent today, the reality is far from Nkrumah's aspirations. While Africa has witnessed more democratic transitions in recent decades, elections have often become contested events, with leaders manipulating the system to retain power, and military coups undermining the democratic process. What went wrong?
In countries like Zimbabwe the painful reality is that he ballot is becoming increasingly irrelevant. Under Robert Mugabe, who ruled Zimbabwe for 37 years, elections were marred by violence, intimidation, and electoral fraud. While Mugabe's government claimed legitimacy through the ballot, the people's will was often disregarded in favor of maintaining political control. The 2008 presidential election in Zimbabwe serves as a chilling example, with Mugabe's regime resorting to violence to suppress opposition, leading to widespread claims of vote rigging. The tragic irony was that Mugabe, once a liberation hero, had become a symbol of tyranny, showing how the ballot can be hijacked by those who seek power at any cost. If the ballot is compromised by fraud and violence, can democracy still be said to exist?
More recently, in Uganda, President Yoweri Museveni, who has been in power since 1986, has relied on similar tactics to secure his hold on power. His government has repeatedly altered the constitution to remove term limits and amended laws to prevent opposition candidates from challenging him. In 2021, Museveni claimed victory in a highly contested election, which was widely criticized for its lack of transparency and the violent suppression of opposition candidates. The Ugandan government's manipulation of democratic processes has raised alarm, prompting critics to ask: How can a leader who refuses to relinquish power maintain any semblance of legitimacy through elections?
But what happens when the ballot fails, and the bullet becomes the only option for change? The answer to that question has played out on numerous occasions in Africa's recent history. From Mali to Burkina Faso, from Guinea to Chad, military coups have become a disturbing pattern, undermining democratic institutions and eroding the progress made toward civilian rule. In Mali, the military overthrew President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita in August 2020, citing corruption, mismanagement, and the government's failure to address security concerns posed by Islamist insurgencies. The coup was met with widespread support among ordinary Malians, who saw the military as their only hope for ending corruption and restoring stability. In Burkina Faso, soldiers ousted President Roch Marc Christian Kaboré in January 2022, citing similar concerns over his handling of the jihadist insurgency. The question here is whether military rule is the solution when democracy falters, or if it only perpetuates a cycle of instability. Can the military, which is supposed to serve the people, really be the savior when the very systems it upholds are corrupt and inept?
Across the Sahel region, military takeovers have been justified with the promise of restoring order and combating terrorism. However, history has shown that military governments often fail to deliver on their promises. The hope that soldiers would improve governance, tackle corruption, and strengthen democratic institutions often gives way to authoritarianism and human rights abuses. In Guinea, for instance, the 2021 coup led by Colonel Mamady Doumbouya initially promised to restore order and establish a transition to democracy. Yet, as time passes, it becomes apparent that military regimes struggle to govern effectively without the political legitimacy provided by democratic institutions. Are the military's promises of reform simply empty rhetoric, or do they reflect a deeper failure of civilian leaders to provide for the people?
What, then, is the future of democracy in Africa? The question remains an open one, and there is no easy answer. On the one hand, democracy is undeniably fragile across much of Africa. Electoral processes continue to be undermined by corruption, violence, and authoritarianism. In some countries, such as Tanzania, Malawi, and Zambia, elections have shown positive signs of democratic maturity, but these examples remain the exception rather than the rule. In these countries, the ballots seem to hold genuine meaning, and the results reflect the people's will. But these positive examples raise a critical question: what are the conditions that make democracy succeed in some countries but fail in others?
On the other hand, the growing frequency of military coups presents a disturbing trend. The more military interventions that occur, the more it becomes clear that Africa's experiment with democracy is still in its infancy. As long as leaders remain unwilling to relinquish power and as long as democratic institutions are weak, the continent will continue to struggle with the balance between ballots and bullets. Africa's political systems need to evolve to prioritize the protection of democratic processes, the rule of law, and human rights. But this cannot happen in isolation. African leaders must look beyond their borders for solutions, engaging in regional cooperation and reform to strengthen the continent's commitment to democracy.
The African Union (AU) and regional organizations like ECOWAS play a crucial role in promoting democratic governance and holding leaders accountable. Yet, these organizations have often been criticized for their inability to effectively intervene when democracy is under threat. The AU's response to the recent coups in Mali, Guinea, and Burkina Faso has been muted, often choosing diplomatic pressure over direct intervention. If Africa is to ensure the survival of democracy, its institutions must become more robust in addressing violations of democratic principles and holding leaders accountable. At the same time, African citizens must demand greater transparency, accountability, and the protection of their rights.
Kwame Nkrumah once said, "We must unite and form a United States of Africa." While Nkrumah's vision of a united continent has yet to be realized, his words still resonate today. A more united Africa, with strong democratic institutions, could help combat the rising tide of military interventions. The idea of African unity is not just about economic cooperation, but about creating a political environment where democracy can thrive. Unity, in this sense, means not only economic partnerships but also political solidarity to defend democratic norms and values. The African Union, as well as regional blocs like ECOWAS, must play a more active role in fostering democratic governance, providing a clear alternative to the destructive cycle of military rule.
However, the question remains: how can Africa's leaders break free from the colonial legacy of weak institutions and corrupt political systems? How can the continent rebuild trust in democratic processes when many citizens feel disillusioned by corrupt politicians and ineffective governments? The answer, it seems, lies in fostering a culture of democratic participation, where citizens are not mere subjects of authoritarian rule but active participants in shaping their future. Only when the people believe in the power of the ballot and when their leaders believe in the power of the people will democracy take root.
Africa's struggle for democracy is far from over. It is a battle fought not only in the corridors of power but in the hearts and minds of ordinary citizens. The ballot, when respected and free from manipulation, remains the most powerful tool for change. But for Africa to truly be free, its leaders must learn to serve the people, rather than rule over them. As Nkrumah wisely said, "Seek ye first the political kingdom, and all things will be added unto you." Africa's path to democracy may be long, but it is a path worth walking, one that demands the active participation of both leaders and citizens alike. The question now is whether Africa is ready to make that journey.
Vanessa Chisi is an undergraduate student at Africa University and she writes this in her personal capacity
Source - Rutendo Vanessa Chisi
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
