Opinion / Columnist
Mutambara trashes Zanu-PF manifesto
14 May 2018 at 02:50hrs | Views
Despite the critique we have offered in the past, Zanu-PF in its recently launched manifesto, insist on claiming that its vision is for Zimbabwe to be a middle-income country (MIC) by 2030.
This is a bland and banal statement which requires qualification, quantification and supporting details for it to be meaningful. What does that vision statement even mean?
The MIC nomenclature is a World Bank analytical tool that refers to economies with a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ranging from $1 005 to $12 235.
This is too broad a grouping. In any case our GDP per capita income is $977, hence jumping to $1 005 (if we consider minimum qualification) over 12 years is not sufficiently ambitious. This is not visionary at all.
It is instructive to note that the MICs are broken up into lower-MIC and upper-MICs.
Lower-MICs have GDP per capita ranging from $1 006 to $3 955, while upper-MICs have per GDP per capita ranging from $3 956 to $12 235.
Does Zanu-PF aim for Zimbabwe to be a lower-MIC or an upper-MIC?
More importantly, what is the target GDP per capita in their vision formulation?
They must be specific and say we aim to be an MIC with a stated GDP per capita number (or range of numbers).
Even with this flawed approach to the national vision process, there is need for caution.
We must use the Rule of 70, which is a mathematical calculation used in economics to calculate how an economy can double its GDP per capita given a specific growth
rate.
Under this rule, the number of years to double a GDP per capita is equal to 70 divided by the growth rate.
So, for example, if we grow by 3%, then it will take us 70/3 = 23,33 years, to double our GDP per capita.
If we grow at 5%, then it will take us 14 years. For Zimbabwe to double its GDP per capita by 2030, that is, attain a GDP per capita of at least $1 944, it needs to grow by about 6% every year for the next 12 years — which is a tall order.
China did it though, but it is not easy. In Zanu-PF's vision, what is the target growth rate for Zimbabwe for the next 12 years to 2030?
In the manifesto, there is target of attaining a growth rate of at least 6% per annum over the period 2018 to 2023. What happens beyond 2023? They do not tell us.
Let us be generous and assume that Zanu-PF wants to double our GDP per capita by 2030 — which would require an average growth of 6% for 12 years.
The problem is that it has been a historical impossibility, with the exception of China.
For example, between 1970 and 2010, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries only grew by an average of 1,9%!
With Zimbabwe, for sure in the first few years, we may experience above average growth rates because of our low base, but we will eventually gravitate towards standard and traditional growth rates, which are much lower than 6%.
More significantly from my analysis of their entire Zanu-PF manifesto, I don't see where that growth of at least 6% over the period 2018 to 2030, will come from.
There is absolutely no articulated and demonstrated sources of such phenomenal growth. Nothing!
It is neither sensible nor meaningful for Zanu-PF to posit that their vision is for Zimbabwe to be an MIC by 2030.
Zimbabwe needs a proper vision process and a more rigorous economic planning effort.
In its 2018 manifesto, Zanu-PF gets both the vision process and vision content wrong.
A national vision has three pillars — politics, society & the economy — with over-arching issues being values and mega-impact projects.
------
Arthur Mutambara is a former Deputy Prime Minister of Zimbabwe during the unity government
This is a bland and banal statement which requires qualification, quantification and supporting details for it to be meaningful. What does that vision statement even mean?
The MIC nomenclature is a World Bank analytical tool that refers to economies with a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ranging from $1 005 to $12 235.
This is too broad a grouping. In any case our GDP per capita income is $977, hence jumping to $1 005 (if we consider minimum qualification) over 12 years is not sufficiently ambitious. This is not visionary at all.
It is instructive to note that the MICs are broken up into lower-MIC and upper-MICs.
Lower-MICs have GDP per capita ranging from $1 006 to $3 955, while upper-MICs have per GDP per capita ranging from $3 956 to $12 235.
Does Zanu-PF aim for Zimbabwe to be a lower-MIC or an upper-MIC?
More importantly, what is the target GDP per capita in their vision formulation?
They must be specific and say we aim to be an MIC with a stated GDP per capita number (or range of numbers).
Even with this flawed approach to the national vision process, there is need for caution.
We must use the Rule of 70, which is a mathematical calculation used in economics to calculate how an economy can double its GDP per capita given a specific growth
rate.
Under this rule, the number of years to double a GDP per capita is equal to 70 divided by the growth rate.
So, for example, if we grow by 3%, then it will take us 70/3 = 23,33 years, to double our GDP per capita.
If we grow at 5%, then it will take us 14 years. For Zimbabwe to double its GDP per capita by 2030, that is, attain a GDP per capita of at least $1 944, it needs to grow by about 6% every year for the next 12 years — which is a tall order.
China did it though, but it is not easy. In Zanu-PF's vision, what is the target growth rate for Zimbabwe for the next 12 years to 2030?
In the manifesto, there is target of attaining a growth rate of at least 6% per annum over the period 2018 to 2023. What happens beyond 2023? They do not tell us.
Let us be generous and assume that Zanu-PF wants to double our GDP per capita by 2030 — which would require an average growth of 6% for 12 years.
The problem is that it has been a historical impossibility, with the exception of China.
For example, between 1970 and 2010, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries only grew by an average of 1,9%!
With Zimbabwe, for sure in the first few years, we may experience above average growth rates because of our low base, but we will eventually gravitate towards standard and traditional growth rates, which are much lower than 6%.
More significantly from my analysis of their entire Zanu-PF manifesto, I don't see where that growth of at least 6% over the period 2018 to 2030, will come from.
There is absolutely no articulated and demonstrated sources of such phenomenal growth. Nothing!
It is neither sensible nor meaningful for Zanu-PF to posit that their vision is for Zimbabwe to be an MIC by 2030.
Zimbabwe needs a proper vision process and a more rigorous economic planning effort.
In its 2018 manifesto, Zanu-PF gets both the vision process and vision content wrong.
A national vision has three pillars — politics, society & the economy — with over-arching issues being values and mega-impact projects.
------
Arthur Mutambara is a former Deputy Prime Minister of Zimbabwe during the unity government
Source - Arthur Mutambara
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
