Opinion / Columnist
Government and parents complicity is creating a class of useless graduates
04 Mar 2019 at 05:06hrs | Views
Government and parents are delinquently complicity in allowing our young people to pursue tertiary level qualifications that offer no value to either the country or to the graduate. The pursuit of academic paper will lead to a future class of useless graduates.
It is utterly incomprehensible and inconceivable that a people can collectively connive to be irresponsible and cruel to young people by wasting their time, energy and other resources in pursuit of not so useful education.
It is dereliction of duty by parents, government and higher education institutions to force feed the young to study and obtain pieces of tertiary education papers of no value to either themselves or the world.
For most parents such a waste of their financial resources is often driven by societal pressure to tick boxes and obtain temporary pride of a child in university. Unfortunately the truth is the mother of time as reality often manifest in a nil return on the financial investment.
As a country we may as well just hold on to the fable that we comparatively have a highly educated and literate population in Africa. This narrative though has nothing to do with a desired future of full employment. Even if the narrative were true it is a pointer that an education system paradigm shift is required continent wide.
I think some of our young people, outside a miracle, will never find use of their education. We already have a lot of 90s graduates unemployed, a significant number of them under employed and some are reluctant enterprenuers.It will be irresponsible to perpetuate such cruelty.
Our education system need a complete overhaul to be of relevance for the future.The economic challenges aside the country has been over supplying the country with graduates holding useless pieces of paper.
The strategic intention of an education system should be to cover present country competence/skills gaps, match or exceed national strategic intentions, propel socio-economic needs and propagate an innovation or business ecosystem.
An education strategy should also be alive to globalisation of everything including labour. Our competitors for labour are now products of an education systems of diverse countries, continents and often borderless institutions.
Industries often locate near the labour factor of production. Competitive and relevant educational output therefore is an imperative for a countries socio-economic health. It attracts capital.
Education must incubate future global leaders with fibre to think of new innovative solutions and possibly disrupt the present industrial complex.
We seem to be deploying a haphazard approach to what should be important. What is important is to decipher our educational needs. The government must have the decency of undertaking a needs and skills gap analysis.
As a start the country universities should be centres for propagation of innovation start –up ecosystem, capacitate research , start innovation funnels, value add mineral, partner diaspora and international experts, invest in technology transfer and partner capital.
Professors at great universities are sponsored by international brands due to the value universities bring to Industry and Commerce. This value is new truths and new solutions.I will doubt capital will partner institutions that promote regurgitation and memorizing of theories and old truths.
There is an urgent need to abandon a lot of academic programs, curtail numbers in some and outright closure of some institutions. We should not propagate universities whose output neither the world nor the country nor a society nor the individual will ever use.
The education budgets seem driven at building physical infrastructure instead of developing an ecosystem for value creation. Investment in education should inspire creative thinking to solve challenges in our midst, aspire to provide new solutions to the world, ensure creation of demand and develop products and or services the world never knew would be required.
Instead raising neurotics who memorize facts and theories it is more valuable to teach capacity to challenge the theories and search for new universal truths.
It's a little unfortunate that we tend to politicize everything. Part of the solution matrix that could have ensured propagation of education for innovation, value creation and entrepreneurship was in deliberate promotion of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematices.Its unfortunate that due to political expediency they threw out not only the politician but also the programme.
Our government known public policy goal is job creation and in trying to achieve that goal it is deliberately promoting the existing industrial complex.Unfortunately for the Industrialist productivity and competitiveness instead of creation of jobs is their measure of economic success.In fact job creation is not a motivation for capitalists.
The Industrialist quest for efficiency and productivity will drive investments in automation, Artificial Intelligence and robotics. The drive will accelerate skills shift and loss of jobs. In fact widespread job destruction is a strategic goal for any capitalist because jobs are a price (not a benefit) of a factor of production. Labour is an avoidable cost of production.
The government itself should not prevent job losses as it means giving up immense and lucrative opportunities that come with AI.Instead the government should be an enabler in educating its citizen's right so as to exploit the opportunities that come with such seismic changes.
Unlike during the Industrial Revolution were for every job lost to machines at least at one more job was created. This time we are facing a different challenge. As Yuval Noah Harari said " We might have the worst of both worlds that is, suffering for massive unemployment and at the same time having a shortage of skilled labour."
The new revolution and disruption of Artificial intelligence and robotics will create new skills requirements and or increase demand for some presently out of demand qualifications. At the same time some skills will become redundant and extinct. Some skills will be required in limited quantities. So we may face both unemployment and shortage of skills at the same time.
Our education system seems regurgitating the same output irrespective of the challenges that automation and artificial intelligence will pose. The government should disrupt the present education model so that the new is able to speak to skills shifts, job losses, need to retrain, and shortage of skilled labour and to curb future unemployment.
Zimbabwe aspires to be a middle income economy by 2030 .The industrial complex of 2030 will be led by firms without land, mines, infrastructure (like hotels and classrooms) amongst many physical resources. In our favourite primary industries of agriculture and mining the Fast Company predict labour displacement from semi-skilled to skilled labour. The skills shift will be due to use of machines with cognitive skills that may replace routine decision making jobs.
If the country is to be competitive to drive the 2030 agenda it has to preserve workers economic value and relevance. To do that there is need for investment in providing a foundation for skills transition and re-education. Without such an investment the government (read taxpayer) will have to be content with a welfare state and provision of economic safety nets for the unemployed.
The country graduates and potential labour force face an additional challenge of globalisation labour with the attendant opening up of labour markets. The country education output may have to be content with competing with the world.
To ensure our young people have a chance on the labour market a whole lot of painful change in both content (quality) and quantity of output is an imperative. It should be a strategic focus to ensure we have graduates that compete at all levels. The starting point could benchmark with best practice, cooperation and competing with peers and deploying strategies to leapfrog peers in areas the country has competitive advantage.
To add more value to the country education output and ecosystem a deliberate and tailor made diaspora skills attraction policy is imperative. Expatriate attraction and retention schemes are also required. If we provide peanuts lets expect baboons to work. Expertise is expensive and highly internationalised.
Without doubt in the medium term the country will not need thousands of educated graduates with unwanted and or unuseable skills. The country won't need thousands of accountants, economists, social scientists, historians, political and development scientists, cultural and heritage practitioners, marketing practitioners and so forth. The country is over supplying labour when there is limited or no future demand.
We need a national strategy and resource redeployment to build good and relevant education that teaches new skills. Soon or later the government will not be able to socially sustain a large number of unemployment. People will always have a quest for meaning and this may mean a quest jobs.
Brian Sedze is the President of Free Enterprise Initiative. Free Enterprise Initiative is an advocacy in less government, free enterprise, fiscal and public policy. He can be contacted on brian.sedze@gmail.com
It is utterly incomprehensible and inconceivable that a people can collectively connive to be irresponsible and cruel to young people by wasting their time, energy and other resources in pursuit of not so useful education.
It is dereliction of duty by parents, government and higher education institutions to force feed the young to study and obtain pieces of tertiary education papers of no value to either themselves or the world.
For most parents such a waste of their financial resources is often driven by societal pressure to tick boxes and obtain temporary pride of a child in university. Unfortunately the truth is the mother of time as reality often manifest in a nil return on the financial investment.
As a country we may as well just hold on to the fable that we comparatively have a highly educated and literate population in Africa. This narrative though has nothing to do with a desired future of full employment. Even if the narrative were true it is a pointer that an education system paradigm shift is required continent wide.
I think some of our young people, outside a miracle, will never find use of their education. We already have a lot of 90s graduates unemployed, a significant number of them under employed and some are reluctant enterprenuers.It will be irresponsible to perpetuate such cruelty.
Our education system need a complete overhaul to be of relevance for the future.The economic challenges aside the country has been over supplying the country with graduates holding useless pieces of paper.
The strategic intention of an education system should be to cover present country competence/skills gaps, match or exceed national strategic intentions, propel socio-economic needs and propagate an innovation or business ecosystem.
An education strategy should also be alive to globalisation of everything including labour. Our competitors for labour are now products of an education systems of diverse countries, continents and often borderless institutions.
Industries often locate near the labour factor of production. Competitive and relevant educational output therefore is an imperative for a countries socio-economic health. It attracts capital.
Education must incubate future global leaders with fibre to think of new innovative solutions and possibly disrupt the present industrial complex.
We seem to be deploying a haphazard approach to what should be important. What is important is to decipher our educational needs. The government must have the decency of undertaking a needs and skills gap analysis.
As a start the country universities should be centres for propagation of innovation start –up ecosystem, capacitate research , start innovation funnels, value add mineral, partner diaspora and international experts, invest in technology transfer and partner capital.
Professors at great universities are sponsored by international brands due to the value universities bring to Industry and Commerce. This value is new truths and new solutions.I will doubt capital will partner institutions that promote regurgitation and memorizing of theories and old truths.
There is an urgent need to abandon a lot of academic programs, curtail numbers in some and outright closure of some institutions. We should not propagate universities whose output neither the world nor the country nor a society nor the individual will ever use.
The education budgets seem driven at building physical infrastructure instead of developing an ecosystem for value creation. Investment in education should inspire creative thinking to solve challenges in our midst, aspire to provide new solutions to the world, ensure creation of demand and develop products and or services the world never knew would be required.
Instead raising neurotics who memorize facts and theories it is more valuable to teach capacity to challenge the theories and search for new universal truths.
It's a little unfortunate that we tend to politicize everything. Part of the solution matrix that could have ensured propagation of education for innovation, value creation and entrepreneurship was in deliberate promotion of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematices.Its unfortunate that due to political expediency they threw out not only the politician but also the programme.
Our government known public policy goal is job creation and in trying to achieve that goal it is deliberately promoting the existing industrial complex.Unfortunately for the Industrialist productivity and competitiveness instead of creation of jobs is their measure of economic success.In fact job creation is not a motivation for capitalists.
The Industrialist quest for efficiency and productivity will drive investments in automation, Artificial Intelligence and robotics. The drive will accelerate skills shift and loss of jobs. In fact widespread job destruction is a strategic goal for any capitalist because jobs are a price (not a benefit) of a factor of production. Labour is an avoidable cost of production.
The government itself should not prevent job losses as it means giving up immense and lucrative opportunities that come with AI.Instead the government should be an enabler in educating its citizen's right so as to exploit the opportunities that come with such seismic changes.
Unlike during the Industrial Revolution were for every job lost to machines at least at one more job was created. This time we are facing a different challenge. As Yuval Noah Harari said " We might have the worst of both worlds that is, suffering for massive unemployment and at the same time having a shortage of skilled labour."
The new revolution and disruption of Artificial intelligence and robotics will create new skills requirements and or increase demand for some presently out of demand qualifications. At the same time some skills will become redundant and extinct. Some skills will be required in limited quantities. So we may face both unemployment and shortage of skills at the same time.
Our education system seems regurgitating the same output irrespective of the challenges that automation and artificial intelligence will pose. The government should disrupt the present education model so that the new is able to speak to skills shifts, job losses, need to retrain, and shortage of skilled labour and to curb future unemployment.
Zimbabwe aspires to be a middle income economy by 2030 .The industrial complex of 2030 will be led by firms without land, mines, infrastructure (like hotels and classrooms) amongst many physical resources. In our favourite primary industries of agriculture and mining the Fast Company predict labour displacement from semi-skilled to skilled labour. The skills shift will be due to use of machines with cognitive skills that may replace routine decision making jobs.
If the country is to be competitive to drive the 2030 agenda it has to preserve workers economic value and relevance. To do that there is need for investment in providing a foundation for skills transition and re-education. Without such an investment the government (read taxpayer) will have to be content with a welfare state and provision of economic safety nets for the unemployed.
The country graduates and potential labour force face an additional challenge of globalisation labour with the attendant opening up of labour markets. The country education output may have to be content with competing with the world.
To ensure our young people have a chance on the labour market a whole lot of painful change in both content (quality) and quantity of output is an imperative. It should be a strategic focus to ensure we have graduates that compete at all levels. The starting point could benchmark with best practice, cooperation and competing with peers and deploying strategies to leapfrog peers in areas the country has competitive advantage.
To add more value to the country education output and ecosystem a deliberate and tailor made diaspora skills attraction policy is imperative. Expatriate attraction and retention schemes are also required. If we provide peanuts lets expect baboons to work. Expertise is expensive and highly internationalised.
Without doubt in the medium term the country will not need thousands of educated graduates with unwanted and or unuseable skills. The country won't need thousands of accountants, economists, social scientists, historians, political and development scientists, cultural and heritage practitioners, marketing practitioners and so forth. The country is over supplying labour when there is limited or no future demand.
We need a national strategy and resource redeployment to build good and relevant education that teaches new skills. Soon or later the government will not be able to socially sustain a large number of unemployment. People will always have a quest for meaning and this may mean a quest jobs.
Brian Sedze is the President of Free Enterprise Initiative. Free Enterprise Initiative is an advocacy in less government, free enterprise, fiscal and public policy. He can be contacted on brian.sedze@gmail.com
Source - Brian Sedze
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
