Opinion / WhatsApp Updates
'Mugabe too old to lead any forum be it a nation, organisation, union'
11 Feb 2015 at 08:36hrs | Views
Please note that Bulawayo24 does not edit WhatsApp updates. We publish them as sent by our readers and we do not disclose the sender's telephone Number.
20:10, 7 Feb - +27 7* *** ****: The appointment of President Robert Mugabe into the chairmanship of tha A.U may be a milestone into the political career of Mugabe and Zimbabwe on the african political arena. But l believe its a betrayal to the Zimbabwean mass at large, for the same person whom they have made to preside over the A.U, has dismally and failed to run his own country.
Which criterion do they use to ascertain the credibility of a candidate to lead the A.U. For in the case of president Mugabe who has led his country from a thriving bread basket of Africa to jus an empty case, with unemployment levels hovering above 80%, and industry and manufacturing sectors have crumpled down. I believe the move to award president Mugabe with that position has betrayed the Zimbabweans. For the majority of Zimbabweans are calling for his ouster due to his failed ability in the running the Zimbabwean nation, yet the A.U is saying otherwise.
What the A.U members are trying to say is that president Mugabe is still sane and still in the capacity to lead and preside over Africas affairs. I tend to disagree given his old age and the recent slipups in his utterances when addressing Zanu PF supporters proves to the contrary.
We are saying president Mugabe is too old to lead any forum be it a nation, organisation and any union, hence his appointment to the chairmanship of A.U has reduced the hopes of some Zimbabweans to seek the intercession of other african countries on the removal of president Mugabe in leading Zimbabwe.
20:10, 7 Feb - +27 7* *** ****: The appointment of President Robert Mugabe into the chairmanship of tha A.U may be a milestone into the political career of Mugabe and Zimbabwe on the african political arena. But l believe its a betrayal to the Zimbabwean mass at large, for the same person whom they have made to preside over the A.U, has dismally and failed to run his own country.
Which criterion do they use to ascertain the credibility of a candidate to lead the A.U. For in the case of president Mugabe who has led his country from a thriving bread basket of Africa to jus an empty case, with unemployment levels hovering above 80%, and industry and manufacturing sectors have crumpled down. I believe the move to award president Mugabe with that position has betrayed the Zimbabweans. For the majority of Zimbabweans are calling for his ouster due to his failed ability in the running the Zimbabwean nation, yet the A.U is saying otherwise.
What the A.U members are trying to say is that president Mugabe is still sane and still in the capacity to lead and preside over Africas affairs. I tend to disagree given his old age and the recent slipups in his utterances when addressing Zanu PF supporters proves to the contrary.
We are saying president Mugabe is too old to lead any forum be it a nation, organisation and any union, hence his appointment to the chairmanship of A.U has reduced the hopes of some Zimbabweans to seek the intercession of other african countries on the removal of president Mugabe in leading Zimbabwe.
Source - Byo24News via WhatsApp
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
