Latest News Editor's Choice


Opinion / Columnist

Whither MDC after Supreme Court judgment?

22 May 2020 at 07:05hrs | Views
THE MDC is at the crossroads, probably of a never-seen-before nature since its formation in 1999. On May 5 2020, Parliament recalled four of the MDC Alliance's MPs.

This was a major step by acting MDC-T leader Thokozani Khupe in the convoluted implementation of the Supreme Court judgment which controversially restored her as the legitimate acting president of the party. With the recalling of the four MPs, who are evidently key leaders in the party and Parliament, a significant part of the ground has been cut from under the feet of the MDC Alliance.

Khupe has sent the message that more and more ground will be cut. The intention is primarily to make MDC Alliance MPs believe that their party is standing on ground which is giving way. The occult hand of the State is visible. Khupe has the State machinery on her side. She is suddenly the kingmaker. With the "machete to recall" in her hands, she can rampage through Parliament, recalling MDC parliamentarians who are unwilling to join her side of the divide.

I attempt to answer four questions. The first question is: Where should the MDC Alliance go from here? The party can choose to take the fight to the courts. But this will be clearly a fruitless endeavour. But one advantage of doing so is that the partiality of the court and the Zanu-PF hand can be exposed further. But again, is this helpful? Zanu-PF has been "superfluously exposed".

Besides, the party has exposed itself in equal measure, many times recklessly and arrogantly, believing that its "right to rule" drives not from the people, but its contribution to the liberation struggle and its ownership and control of the storehouses of violent repression. It is not the exposure that matters, but the consequences which arise from it.

As long as Zanu-PF believes that no serious consequences will ever arise from the exposure, then the exposure is of limited importance for the opposition. It will also appear oxymoronic for the opposition to accuse the courts of dispensing "corona justice", but approach the same to seek rarefied justice. It is clear that the MDC Alliance's first and last line of defence are the people. It, therefore, has to take the battle to the people. They are the ultimate custodians of the struggle.

If the people are so fundamental to the struggle, the party should not take them for granted anymore. The painful observation I have made is this: the supporters of the MDC are willing to lose their livestock and livelihoods; to be denied food and other forms of assistance; to have their homes torched; to have their eyes gouged out and their limbs hacked and to be flogged or shot dead on the streets, all for what they believe is a long and tortuous fight for the greater and inclusive good.

If they are faced with the reality of choosing between their goats or the common good, they certainly pick the common good. But MDC leaders are largely on the other side of the spectrum. They are obsessed with feathering their own nests, hiding behind the smokescreen of democratic struggle. If their power ambitions get to a dead end, they can turn against the party, wielding a ruthless machete. And this is not only limited to the so-called rebels or sell-outs.

The MDC Alliance MPs have the space to make personal decisions. There are two paths in front of them: to join Khupe's MDC or to remain in the alliance tent.

The main incentive to join Khupe would be to maintain their parliamentary seats. But in the long term, their political fortunes will fizzle out. however, they can start to benefit from association with Zanu-PF. On the other hand, remaining in the MDC Alliance may temporarily cost them their parliamentary seats. But they can resign en masse, contest by-elections and win all or the majority of the seats.

This is the best path to take and it needs to be taken immediately because it quickly disempowers Khupe. The more the party delays, the more its MPs are tempted to vacillate between two contesting opinions as Khupe wields the "machete to recall". But the MDC Alliance MPs need to understand that a parliamentary seat is not more important than the common good which the party claims to fight for. Where one cannot take both, it is better to pick the common good and let the parliamentary seat go. This is a lesson from the party's battle-hardened supporters. Whichever path they choose to take, it is good to put principles ahead of expediency. hard and selfless decisions have to be made.

At this point, the MDC Alliance also needs to do three fundamental things. First, it needs to lay claim to the furtherance of the ideals of the liberation struggle. It should enunciate the values of the liberation struggle and how Zanu-PF has desecrated them. In doing so, it attracts disgruntled people from Zanu-PF who believe or can be convinced that the party has taken a permanent detour from the ideals of the liberation struggle. It also helps it to show that it is a party which is rooted in the aspirations and needs of the people of Zimbabwe, historical, contemporary and in future.

It is not enough to claim that it is a party of the future without linking the future to the past. It has to be a seamless thread of the past, present and future. Second, it should focus on delivering pointable pockets of change and progress. This will prove its commitment and capability to deliver a "new Zimbabwe".

-------
Moses Tofa is a holder of a PhD in political studies from the University of Johannesburg and a PhD in peace studies from the University of KwaZulu-Natal. He can be contacted moses.tofa@yahoo.co.uk. He writes here in his personal capacity.

Source - newsday
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.

Subscribe

Email: