News / International
Noam Chomsky on Clinton vs. Sanders
01 Feb 2016 at 09:26hrs | Views
Professor Noam Chomsky, the U.S. academic, award-winning author and public intellectual, speaks with Al Jazeera English's Mehdi Hasan
• Says he would "absolutely" vote for Hillary Clinton over any Republican candidate, if he lived in a swing state
• Calls Bernie Sanders a "New Dealer", rather than a socialist, who "doesn't have much of a chance"
• Says there are "enormous differences" between the policies of the Democrats and the Republicans
• Dismisses "hysterical, slanderous" criticism from new atheist author Sam Harris and says the latter's rhetoric "looks like" Islamophobia.
In an interview with Al Jazeera English's flagship current affairs show, UpFront, MIT emeritus professor Noam Chomsky said he would "absolutely" vote for Democrat Hillary Clinton over Republicans Ted Cruz or Donald Trump, if he lived in a swing state such as Ohio.
"Oh absolutely... My vote would be against the Republican candidate," said Chomsky, who lives in Massachusetts, a safe state for the Democrats.
In the wide-ranging interview with Mehdi Hasan, Chomsky also drew a clear distinction between the Republican and Democratic party platforms, specially in a potential Clinton vs. Cruz contest.
"There are enormous differences," he explained. "Every Republican candidate is either a climate change denier or a skeptic who says we can't do it," adding: "What they are saying is, 'Let's destroy the world.' Is that worth voting against? Yeah."
The MIT academic also referred to Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Bernie Sanders not as a "socialist" but as "basically a new dealer", adding: "I agree with him in a lot of things, not in other things. I frankly think that in our system of mainly bought elections he doesn't have much of a chance, but if he were elected I think he would - of the current candidates - I think he'd be the one who would have, from my point of view, the best policies."
One of Chomsky's biggest critics, neuroscientist and new atheist Sam Harris, recently said that, if forced to choose, he would vote for Ben Carson over Chomsky because Carson "understands that jihadists are the enemy."
"I don't bother with Sam Harris," Chomsky told UpFront in response. "He specialises in hysterical, slanderous charges against people he doesn't like. That's of no interest to me."
"Am I not concerned with jihadi terrorism? I'm much more concerned with it than he [Sam Harris] is," he added.
Chomsky further accused Harris of inciting Islamophobia through his writing. "Harris, I assume, denies it," he said. "But when I read what he says, that's what it looks like."
"The problem of Islamophobia is of course serious, just like the problem of anti-Semitism is serious," he added. "This is much worse, Islamophobia now."
Watch and embed the nine-minute interview at
UpFront, hosted by Mehdi Hasan, broadcasts on Fridays at 19.30 GMT/21.30SAST. For more information, visit http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/ or follow UpFront on Twitter @AJUpFront
• Calls Bernie Sanders a "New Dealer", rather than a socialist, who "doesn't have much of a chance"
• Says there are "enormous differences" between the policies of the Democrats and the Republicans
• Dismisses "hysterical, slanderous" criticism from new atheist author Sam Harris and says the latter's rhetoric "looks like" Islamophobia.
In an interview with Al Jazeera English's flagship current affairs show, UpFront, MIT emeritus professor Noam Chomsky said he would "absolutely" vote for Democrat Hillary Clinton over Republicans Ted Cruz or Donald Trump, if he lived in a swing state such as Ohio.
"Oh absolutely... My vote would be against the Republican candidate," said Chomsky, who lives in Massachusetts, a safe state for the Democrats.
In the wide-ranging interview with Mehdi Hasan, Chomsky also drew a clear distinction between the Republican and Democratic party platforms, specially in a potential Clinton vs. Cruz contest.
"There are enormous differences," he explained. "Every Republican candidate is either a climate change denier or a skeptic who says we can't do it," adding: "What they are saying is, 'Let's destroy the world.' Is that worth voting against? Yeah."
The MIT academic also referred to Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Bernie Sanders not as a "socialist" but as "basically a new dealer", adding: "I agree with him in a lot of things, not in other things. I frankly think that in our system of mainly bought elections he doesn't have much of a chance, but if he were elected I think he would - of the current candidates - I think he'd be the one who would have, from my point of view, the best policies."
One of Chomsky's biggest critics, neuroscientist and new atheist Sam Harris, recently said that, if forced to choose, he would vote for Ben Carson over Chomsky because Carson "understands that jihadists are the enemy."
"I don't bother with Sam Harris," Chomsky told UpFront in response. "He specialises in hysterical, slanderous charges against people he doesn't like. That's of no interest to me."
"Am I not concerned with jihadi terrorism? I'm much more concerned with it than he [Sam Harris] is," he added.
Chomsky further accused Harris of inciting Islamophobia through his writing. "Harris, I assume, denies it," he said. "But when I read what he says, that's what it looks like."
"The problem of Islamophobia is of course serious, just like the problem of anti-Semitism is serious," he added. "This is much worse, Islamophobia now."
Watch and embed the nine-minute interview at
UpFront, hosted by Mehdi Hasan, broadcasts on Fridays at 19.30 GMT/21.30SAST. For more information, visit http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/ or follow UpFront on Twitter @AJUpFront
Source - Al Jazeera
