Zimbabwe violent protests 'false flag' operations by ZANU PF to suppress opposition?

One of the most efficient and effective strategies of dictatorships - that has been used since time immemorial - to suppress any form of opposition, has been the employment of 'false flag' operations, which they will blame their opponents in order to justify their widespread persecution and suppression.

A 'false flag' is a covert operation designed to deceive; the deception creates the appearance of a particular party, group, or nation being responsible for some activity, disguising the actual source of responsibility.

One of the most popular and typical 'false flag' operation was The Reichstag Fire, that most of us studied in history at school.

This was an arson attack on the Reichstag building in Berlin on 27 February 1933. The fire started in the Session Chamber, and, by the time the police and firemen arrived, the main room was engulfed in flames.

The fire was used as evidence by the Nazis that the
Communists were beginning a plot against the German government, subsequently leading to the arrest of Communist leaders.

Adolf Hitler, who was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany four weeks before, on 30 January, urged President Paul von Hindenburg to pass an emergency decree to counter the "ruthless confrontation of the Communist Party of Germany ".

With civil liberties suspended, the government instituted mass arrests of Communists, including all of the Communist parliamentary delegates. With their bitter rival Communists gone and their seats empty, the National Socialist German Workers Party went from being a plurality party to the majority; subsequent elections confirmed that position and thus allowed Hitler to consolidate his power.

There have been numerous other false flag operations throughout history, but the modus operandi has been the same.

A government conducts an attack on itself and makes the attack to appear to be by enemy nations, terrorists, or opposition parties - giving the nation that was supposedly attacked a pretext for domestic repression or foreign military aggression.

In fact, one of the most debatable recent alleged false flag operations - which had global repurcussions - were the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York, USA - which were blamed on Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda group - which resulted in the so-called 'war on terror' disasterous attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.

An increasing number of scholars and investigators, both in the USA and globally, believe they have evidence that the 9/11 attacks were planned by the USA on itself to justify the subsequent wars.

This brings us back to Zimbabwe.

Who really has been behind the recent violent protests that have resulted in a brutal crackdown on the opposition MDC Alliance - the most gruesome being the 14th to 16th January 2019 destruction of property in the country's major cities?

On 1 August 2018, two days after an otherwise peaceful election, the country was rocked by violent protests in the capital Harare, allegedly perpetrated by the MDC Alliance - as they were not happy with the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission's (ZEC) apparent delay in releasing presidential election results - leading to the fatal shooting of at least six unarmed people by security forces using live ammunition.

According to reports, none of those killed were part of the violent protestors.

Why?

Are Zimbabwe security forces not good enough to aim at their targets, such that they missed any of the violent protestors, but shot bystanders?

From the testimonies presented to the subsequently established Monthlante Commission of Inquiry, most of those arrested for the protests actually did not take part, but were arrested whilst going about their duties at the MDC Alliance head offices.

The more violent protests of 14th to 16th January 2019 had the same hallmarks, except that this time they were more widespread - covering some major cities.

However, as before, the violence was blamed on the opposition MDC Alliance - despite the fact that this was supposed to be a STAYAWAY, and called for by the labour movement.

People were urged to simply STAY AT HOME - and, no one was ever encouraged to demonstrate, no matter how peacefully - let alone go on a violent rampage.

Nonetheless, there was widespread looting and vandalism of business properties, and the country's security forces did not seem to do anything to stop these so-called hooligans.

Only later did the forces start shooting people with live ammunition - leading to the killing of at least 20 people and the injury, due to gunshot wounds, of hundreds.

According to reputable local and international human rights organisations, most of those arrested en mass for the violence were rounded up in their residential areas - not at the scene during the protests.

Additionally, these suspects were denied even the most basic constitutional rights, such as adequate access to their legal counsel.

Their subsequent trials were also characterised as a sham, as they were largely denied bail, and rushingly sentenced to outrageous years in jail.

Meanwhile, security forces continued to carry out wanton brutality against innocent people going about their business in their residential areas - with reports of rapes, and beatings up.

The internet was, of course, conveniently shutdown, so as to cover up these atrocities - under the guise of maintaining state security.

Even children were not spared - as they were also brutalised and jailed together with adults.

In all this, those in authority repeatedly blamed the MDC Alliance - together with civil society organisations, and Western governments - for the violence, as a plot to unconstitutionally unseat a democratically elected government.

If that were the case - if these violent protests were not false flag operations  - and the MDC Alliance had indeed planned everything in order to unconstitutionally topple the government of Zimbabwe - why are top leaders like Nelson Chamisa walking about freely?

Should he not - as the alleged 'terrorist leader' - have been the first one to be charged?

Not once have we ever heard the Zimbabwe authorities accuse Chamisa of being the leader of the 'hooligans'.

He is a free man, with president Emmerson Mnangagwa even inviting him for talks at State House?

In fact, if this was not a mere false flag operation, why has the MDC Alliance not been banned?

Let us not forget that these allegations being recklessly made by the government are very serious, and - if genuine - would naturally have led to the banning of the MDC Alliance and the arrest of its entire leadership.

Yes, there has been some arrests of some MDC Alliance members, including members of parliament, but most of the very top leaders are free men and women.

Remember what happened in Egypt in 2013/14 when then democratically elected president Morsi was toppled, his organisation, the Moslem Brotherhood, was declared a terrorist entity, resulting in him and thousands of members being arrested.

But, the lack of such a response in Zimbabwe in the wake of the violent protests - which were characterised as subversive, terrorist, and an attempt to unconstitutionally remove the government - is a clear sign that Harare is playing games with the people of Zimbabwe - and the international community - in an effort to persecute, and by extension, repress, the nation - and soil the name of the MDC Alliance, by branding them terrorists who are destroying people's lives.

Even in Rhodesia, liberation movements were declared terrorists, and were swiftly banned, and their local leaders arrested.

However, since the formation of the opposition MDC in 1999, some very serious accusations have been made by the ZANU PF government against the party.

The MDC has been accused of being agents of foreign Western governments, with the goal of unconstitutionally removing a democratically elected government.

They have been accused of calling for crippling economic sanctions, which have led to the utter destruction of the country's economy and the untold suffering of ordinary people.

And now, they are being accused of possessing weapons of war, and having a military wing - the Vanguard and Democratic Resistance Committees - which, the regime blames for the fatal shooting of at least six people on 1 August 2018.

Yet, over the past 20 years of the MDC's existence, no criminal charges have ever been brought against the party - in spite of what, in any normal country, would be the most serious crimes against the state...ranging from treason to terrorism.

The reason is very obvious to all those who care to open their eyes and ears - the MDC is INNOCENT, and all these allegations by the ZANU PF regime are false and merely meant to subjugate and oppress the opposition party - as well as any other voice of dissent.

ZANU PF has no shred of evidence regarding their 20 year long accusations and allegations against the MDC Alliance!

In fact, ZANU PF knows fully well that they are unashamedly lying both to Zimbabweans and the world!

As we have already seen, some of the MDC Alliance MPs are routinely being arrested, even after being granted bail by the courts.

It is all about persecution and defaming of the MDC Alliance without proffering any concrete proof of any wrong doing.

For instance, the alleged involvement of the party in the January violent protests is flimsly premised on one video in which a party official urges members to heed the labour union's call for a stayaway!

That is all the regime considers enough proof that the MDC Alliance was behind the violence that rocked the nation!

Where does a party official urging supporters to STAY AT HOME, and its active organising of violent protests to unconstitutionally remove a sitting government converge?

So, who truly organised the violence?

From all that we have analysed, it is clear that the ZANU PF government organised these violent protests as a false flag operation, in order to justify its brutal crackdown on the opposition MDC Alliance.

Let us not forget that this is not the first time that the ZANU PF regime has been involved in false flag operations.

In the 1980s, the ZANU PF regime deployed the 5th Brigade military unit to the Midlands and Matebeleland provinces, which committed untold genocidal atrocities in which over 20,000 innocent and unarmed men, women and children were gruesomely massacred under the pretext of fighting a 'dissident' insurgency.

How many 'dissidents' were these?

According to some expert figures, not more than 20 men!

One then wonders whether such a brazen murder of over 20,000 unarmed innocent people, just to eliminate 20 'dissidents', made any sense.

Besides, if expert analysis is to be believed, of those 20 'dissidents', only three or so were ever killed by the military - most probably, merely bodies taken from victims of Gukurahundi, and paraded as 'dissidents', as the military could not have possibly killed their own!

So, what was really going on?

A cross section of both local and international analysts are convinced that these so-called 'dissidents' were actually ZANU PF operatives, who were moved from one place to another - also committing a fair amount of killings on these same targets as the military.

In other words, the so-called 'dissidents' were part and parcel of the Gukurahundi machinery!

Another ZANU PF false flag operation meant to eliminate the Ndebele people of the Midlands and Matebeleland provinces of Zimbabwe.

Thus, as far as false flag operations are concerned, ZANU PF are masters, and the recent violent protests - which resulted in the brutal crackdown on both the opposition MDC Alliance and innocent citizens - can never be disputed.

Why did the security forces fail to control the violent protests, despite their superior armoury?

Why did they have to wait and only arrest the alleged 'hooligans' in their residential areas, yet not arrest them on the scene of the crime?

Why were all those arrested denied access to their legal counsel?

Why were their trials haphazardly and rushingly conducted, as if to cover up any real testimonies from the accused?

If Zimbabweans, and the world fail to see this blatant Zimbabwe version of the Reichtag Fire, then we are all blind - or we merely refuse to see!