Opinion / Columnist
Of Zimbabwe media, scarfs, land reform and current affairs
18 Apr 2019 at 03:08hrs | Views
THIS is a weird because some years ago, I worked for ZBC/ZTV. Then we would thrive and take pride in asking well researched questions, the most provocative questions, upfront and mix with questions in public domain.
Despite world media platforms to learn from, journalists at ZBC, ZTV, Herald, Chronicle have failed not just to learn, adopt and copy best practices, but failed audiences over the years and missed opportunities to relate with public.
These journalists are a disgrace to journalism, public spaces and airtime they represent.
Zim in general cant afford to watch let alone listen to the state controlled media. We had expected that under President ED, Zim would implement media reforms, hire the best minds in journalism and promote freedom of speech.
But fear still grips journalists who operating in Zim. Bootlicking is a means of survival by many of these journalists.
Friendly questions and patronising ED is a culture that dates back to Mugabe and has never changed. Its te to clean up these state media and replace these corrupted journalists with fresh minds and technology to advance journalism in the country.
President's Public Image
That scarf would have been a symbol of change, success, new dispensation and progress if he had succeeded.
That scarf is now a symbol of ridicule and failure. Judging from daily comments and jokes levelled against ED amd his scarf, its rather too late o change perceptions associated with that scarf.
To make matters worse, scarf doesn't even capture Zim colours, scarf doesn't unite or inspire citizens.
Its too late for him to change and public mockery wont stop either. Scarf is now a symbol of suffering -
Gukurahundi
I am not so sure how much Rwanda or President Paul Kagame had to do with this approach. To be honest, it took me by surprise, yes there was pressure, but that's not new to Zanu-PF, public demands have never moved Zanu-PF.
I think its a great move though, but no amount of money, apology or reburial will bring those people back or closure for the surviving.
The bad image, crimes against humanity and reputation of Zanu-PF wont change or improve. In fact, after so many years, we doubt the sincerity or a ploy to clean up ED international image. Back o back shooting of protesters by the military, in August 2018 and January, 2019 are proof that Gukurahundi was no mistake but well calculated and executed. Zim needs to join ICC / Hague to make aure all perpetrators are brought to book.
Land Reform
The whole chaotic land reform was never to really address the imbalance or share the land, land was given to Zanu-PF supporters, the re-distribution was skewed, un fair and undemocratic.
Only a fraction of certain people benefited from land reform. TAD position is to redistribute land again, based on needs of all Zimbabweans.
Compensation
President ED is not clear on compensating white farmers, we have various pending issues and court. The same Zim white farmers are suing SA govt and also hope to receive compensation. But should these white farmers go back to the same land, then its a reverae and undoing what we already suffered for Zanu PF has never been very clear in title deeds, methods used and demonstration of transparency is missing and lacking - we need a re-do of land reform.
From the start land reform discriminated those who didn't support it - do wasn't fair to majority - a re-do of land reform with technology to farm and produce - with a purpose.
Media changes
President ED is clearly better than President Bob on social media - and those who defend him... its part of democracy - he has been allowed a presence on social media by his handlers. That has brought some air of communication, but it is all propaganda.
TAD media transformation seeks to use technology to gather data, use technology as a tool to create content and news. Serious education, training and allow those in diaspora play a role in shaping Zim future media - technical, branding and a total of all reforms.
We need all voices to be heard. When I met a certain media owner, and told him that he was captured - in a workshop, he fumed at me - we had never met but I still think I was right.
We have two camps of media in Zim... Zanu-PF and its own camp and Independent media belongs to MDC. The rest of us are caught in between - without mouthpieces - so we go social media and we are expanding and it works.
Zim media is too rigid or impractical to change - they can't. We need to clean up from reception to the field.
Watch this space.
Despite world media platforms to learn from, journalists at ZBC, ZTV, Herald, Chronicle have failed not just to learn, adopt and copy best practices, but failed audiences over the years and missed opportunities to relate with public.
These journalists are a disgrace to journalism, public spaces and airtime they represent.
Zim in general cant afford to watch let alone listen to the state controlled media. We had expected that under President ED, Zim would implement media reforms, hire the best minds in journalism and promote freedom of speech.
But fear still grips journalists who operating in Zim. Bootlicking is a means of survival by many of these journalists.
Friendly questions and patronising ED is a culture that dates back to Mugabe and has never changed. Its te to clean up these state media and replace these corrupted journalists with fresh minds and technology to advance journalism in the country.
President's Public Image
That scarf would have been a symbol of change, success, new dispensation and progress if he had succeeded.
That scarf is now a symbol of ridicule and failure. Judging from daily comments and jokes levelled against ED amd his scarf, its rather too late o change perceptions associated with that scarf.
To make matters worse, scarf doesn't even capture Zim colours, scarf doesn't unite or inspire citizens.
Its too late for him to change and public mockery wont stop either. Scarf is now a symbol of suffering -
Gukurahundi
I am not so sure how much Rwanda or President Paul Kagame had to do with this approach. To be honest, it took me by surprise, yes there was pressure, but that's not new to Zanu-PF, public demands have never moved Zanu-PF.
I think its a great move though, but no amount of money, apology or reburial will bring those people back or closure for the surviving.
The bad image, crimes against humanity and reputation of Zanu-PF wont change or improve. In fact, after so many years, we doubt the sincerity or a ploy to clean up ED international image. Back o back shooting of protesters by the military, in August 2018 and January, 2019 are proof that Gukurahundi was no mistake but well calculated and executed. Zim needs to join ICC / Hague to make aure all perpetrators are brought to book.
Land Reform
The whole chaotic land reform was never to really address the imbalance or share the land, land was given to Zanu-PF supporters, the re-distribution was skewed, un fair and undemocratic.
Only a fraction of certain people benefited from land reform. TAD position is to redistribute land again, based on needs of all Zimbabweans.
Compensation
President ED is not clear on compensating white farmers, we have various pending issues and court. The same Zim white farmers are suing SA govt and also hope to receive compensation. But should these white farmers go back to the same land, then its a reverae and undoing what we already suffered for Zanu PF has never been very clear in title deeds, methods used and demonstration of transparency is missing and lacking - we need a re-do of land reform.
From the start land reform discriminated those who didn't support it - do wasn't fair to majority - a re-do of land reform with technology to farm and produce - with a purpose.
Media changes
President ED is clearly better than President Bob on social media - and those who defend him... its part of democracy - he has been allowed a presence on social media by his handlers. That has brought some air of communication, but it is all propaganda.
TAD media transformation seeks to use technology to gather data, use technology as a tool to create content and news. Serious education, training and allow those in diaspora play a role in shaping Zim future media - technical, branding and a total of all reforms.
We need all voices to be heard. When I met a certain media owner, and told him that he was captured - in a workshop, he fumed at me - we had never met but I still think I was right.
We have two camps of media in Zim... Zanu-PF and its own camp and Independent media belongs to MDC. The rest of us are caught in between - without mouthpieces - so we go social media and we are expanding and it works.
Zim media is too rigid or impractical to change - they can't. We need to clean up from reception to the field.
Watch this space.
Source - zimbabwedigitalnews
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
