Opinion / Columnist
Honouring Mbuya Nehanda was a coup for Mnangagwa
30 May 2021 at 08:50hrs | Views
We, from the Zipra side of the Zimbabwe nationalist movement, do not agree with President Ammerson Mnangagwa on many issues, but on the issue of honouring Mbuya Nehanda, reclaiming our history and rewriting it to suit ourselves, we are in complete agreement.
Allow me to declare my credentials. I joined Zapu in Kwekwe at the age of 14 and became an active member when I went to the University of Rhodesia. After many trials and tribulations, I represented that movement in the West Indies, and was responsible for chaperoning Patriotic Front delegates at the Commonwealth Conference, 1973.
If I had not written about this issue in the May 23, 2021 issue of The Standard, I would have been accused of jumping on the bandwagon of Zanu-PF after the event. The inspiration behind the Chimurenga definitely came from an African ancestral spirit base rather than from Christian ideology.
The early nationalists - founding father the Reverend J Samkange, Joshua Nkomo, Josiah Chinamano and Didymus Mutasa - were devout Christians. Prime Minister the Reverend Sir Garfield Todd (1953-1958) had given hope that Africans would be assimilated into the European economy through a fast-track education system. When he was overthrown, for being sympathetic to the African desire for advancement, it dawned on us that co-operation with whites was a nonstarter.
It was Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole's genius, or his realisation that "We are our own liberators", that brought Zanu ahead of Zapu. We had believed, as Zambian leader Kenneth Kaunda had said: "You did it in Zambia, you did it in Malawi, why did you not did it (sic) in Rhodesia?"
It was also Herbert Chitepo's genius that he realised that surely, we could not appeal to the Christian ideology of the oppressors as a basis of our struggle. What then was to be done?
Mbuya Nehanda Nyakasikana and the great liberation veterans of the First Chimurenga was the answer. Their brave words and resistance histories were dug up from the archives, and some were made up. Their brave deeds were awesome.
Nehanda, Gutsa and Hwata were accused of rebellion and insurrection against the British Queen, and the murder of a scoundrel native commission-er, Henry Pollard. Pollard was a scoundrel.
In order to emphasise the point that he was serious about chibharo (forced labour), he tied Chief Mashayamombe to a tree before his 12 wives and children and gave him a whipping.
Another misguided Christian, the Reverend Father Richert, was very concerned about Nehanda going to hell if she did not adopt the white man's religion.
"There comes a time when a leader should stand with his people, and die with them if need be and appeal to his ancestors," she said.
Asked if she was not afraid to die, the words of her reply, as indeed are her other words, are immortal.
"My bones will rise to finish what we started," she replied. She wasn't scared of nothing (American Black English). Even their names were heroic. Kaguvi's other names were Gumboreshumba Chimurenga.
Gutsa, son of Nyashanu, was nicknamed Musoro wegudo. Historians often ignore the Ndebele fighters, who were hanged at the same time with Nehanda. They too had some cool names (US English). One was called Siginyamatshe, another Sigidi (Big Gun) and another was Queen Lozikeyi, who was joined by brother Mkwati the keeper of the earth's secrets and guardian of the Rain bird.
According to a submission by missionaries in the House of Lords, the Ndebele lost over 600 000 cattle. As a result there was widespread infant malnutrition in Matabeleland.
These were cool guys and girls. If our children are not inspired by such heroic figures, they do not de-serve to be called Zimbabweans. We in Zapu were late in realising the inspirational effect such primitive stories could have on young liberation fighters. Christian churches by and large were bystanders in this struggle.
The official churches were strictly on the side of the oppressors.
Mnangagwa, as I mentioned in my column last week, appealed to those spiritual forces that had felt long neglected, the indigenous forces.
Chief Zvimba, in his prayer, appears to have anointed Mnangagwa as the heir to the Chimurenga. I explained in last week's column the yearning by Zanu-PF to gain some spiritual charisma for its leadership.
Whether this will satisfy his need for charisma depends on his future course of action. Nevertheless, he was right in reminding his audience that we are Africans and not British. We have our heroes, they have theirs.
It is right and proper that we honour our own.
"The statute (of Nehanda) is thus a bold and unapologetic statement of the fact that we are a people, who know who we are and where we came from. It is a declaration that we stand proud of our identity." Mnangagwa said.
Truer words have not come from his mouth.
The journey is not complete
While experts agree that the great Chimurenga was a national event that was coordinated by spirit mediums in Mashonaland and Matabeleland, the role played by Ndebele stalwarts like Sigidi and Queen Lozikeyi has not been emphasised.
The significance is that the Shona and Ndebele recognised the colonial invader as a greater threat to their polity to such an extent that they overcame their differences.
Zapu was based on that premise.
Unless Mnangagwa assumes the Zapu mantle, addresses the burning issues in Matabeleland such as the Gukurahundi and the Zambezi Water Project, he will fall short of the charisma. Nehanda and her comrades were transtribal, the first true nationalists.
The journey is not complete until the statues of Mkwati and Queen Lozikeyi are erected in Matabeleland.
In their ceremonies, the Zanu-PF protocols looked and sounded ridiculous. If the master of ceremonies had mentioned the dignitaries by their names, there was no need for a second speaker to repeat the same list of names.
Some nomenclatures are plain silly and primitive. For instance, the president is referred to as the "President, His excellency, the Honourable, Dr eD Mnangagwa, commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, First Secretary of Zanu-PF" and it goes on until the children go to sleep . . .
The opposition members were mentioned in a contemptuous way. It is true that the MDC's position is that the erection of monuments is a return to primitive worship of human beings. This is a mistaken view. every society has heroes and these heroes serve as inspirational figures in times of crises. If you do not revere your own, your children will revere foreign heroes.
Peace.
---
Ken Mufuka is a Zimbabwean patriot. He writes from the US.
Allow me to declare my credentials. I joined Zapu in Kwekwe at the age of 14 and became an active member when I went to the University of Rhodesia. After many trials and tribulations, I represented that movement in the West Indies, and was responsible for chaperoning Patriotic Front delegates at the Commonwealth Conference, 1973.
If I had not written about this issue in the May 23, 2021 issue of The Standard, I would have been accused of jumping on the bandwagon of Zanu-PF after the event. The inspiration behind the Chimurenga definitely came from an African ancestral spirit base rather than from Christian ideology.
The early nationalists - founding father the Reverend J Samkange, Joshua Nkomo, Josiah Chinamano and Didymus Mutasa - were devout Christians. Prime Minister the Reverend Sir Garfield Todd (1953-1958) had given hope that Africans would be assimilated into the European economy through a fast-track education system. When he was overthrown, for being sympathetic to the African desire for advancement, it dawned on us that co-operation with whites was a nonstarter.
It was Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole's genius, or his realisation that "We are our own liberators", that brought Zanu ahead of Zapu. We had believed, as Zambian leader Kenneth Kaunda had said: "You did it in Zambia, you did it in Malawi, why did you not did it (sic) in Rhodesia?"
It was also Herbert Chitepo's genius that he realised that surely, we could not appeal to the Christian ideology of the oppressors as a basis of our struggle. What then was to be done?
Mbuya Nehanda Nyakasikana and the great liberation veterans of the First Chimurenga was the answer. Their brave words and resistance histories were dug up from the archives, and some were made up. Their brave deeds were awesome.
Nehanda, Gutsa and Hwata were accused of rebellion and insurrection against the British Queen, and the murder of a scoundrel native commission-er, Henry Pollard. Pollard was a scoundrel.
In order to emphasise the point that he was serious about chibharo (forced labour), he tied Chief Mashayamombe to a tree before his 12 wives and children and gave him a whipping.
Another misguided Christian, the Reverend Father Richert, was very concerned about Nehanda going to hell if she did not adopt the white man's religion.
"There comes a time when a leader should stand with his people, and die with them if need be and appeal to his ancestors," she said.
Asked if she was not afraid to die, the words of her reply, as indeed are her other words, are immortal.
"My bones will rise to finish what we started," she replied. She wasn't scared of nothing (American Black English). Even their names were heroic. Kaguvi's other names were Gumboreshumba Chimurenga.
Gutsa, son of Nyashanu, was nicknamed Musoro wegudo. Historians often ignore the Ndebele fighters, who were hanged at the same time with Nehanda. They too had some cool names (US English). One was called Siginyamatshe, another Sigidi (Big Gun) and another was Queen Lozikeyi, who was joined by brother Mkwati the keeper of the earth's secrets and guardian of the Rain bird.
According to a submission by missionaries in the House of Lords, the Ndebele lost over 600 000 cattle. As a result there was widespread infant malnutrition in Matabeleland.
These were cool guys and girls. If our children are not inspired by such heroic figures, they do not de-serve to be called Zimbabweans. We in Zapu were late in realising the inspirational effect such primitive stories could have on young liberation fighters. Christian churches by and large were bystanders in this struggle.
The official churches were strictly on the side of the oppressors.
Chief Zvimba, in his prayer, appears to have anointed Mnangagwa as the heir to the Chimurenga. I explained in last week's column the yearning by Zanu-PF to gain some spiritual charisma for its leadership.
Whether this will satisfy his need for charisma depends on his future course of action. Nevertheless, he was right in reminding his audience that we are Africans and not British. We have our heroes, they have theirs.
It is right and proper that we honour our own.
"The statute (of Nehanda) is thus a bold and unapologetic statement of the fact that we are a people, who know who we are and where we came from. It is a declaration that we stand proud of our identity." Mnangagwa said.
Truer words have not come from his mouth.
The journey is not complete
While experts agree that the great Chimurenga was a national event that was coordinated by spirit mediums in Mashonaland and Matabeleland, the role played by Ndebele stalwarts like Sigidi and Queen Lozikeyi has not been emphasised.
The significance is that the Shona and Ndebele recognised the colonial invader as a greater threat to their polity to such an extent that they overcame their differences.
Zapu was based on that premise.
Unless Mnangagwa assumes the Zapu mantle, addresses the burning issues in Matabeleland such as the Gukurahundi and the Zambezi Water Project, he will fall short of the charisma. Nehanda and her comrades were transtribal, the first true nationalists.
The journey is not complete until the statues of Mkwati and Queen Lozikeyi are erected in Matabeleland.
In their ceremonies, the Zanu-PF protocols looked and sounded ridiculous. If the master of ceremonies had mentioned the dignitaries by their names, there was no need for a second speaker to repeat the same list of names.
Some nomenclatures are plain silly and primitive. For instance, the president is referred to as the "President, His excellency, the Honourable, Dr eD Mnangagwa, commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, First Secretary of Zanu-PF" and it goes on until the children go to sleep . . .
The opposition members were mentioned in a contemptuous way. It is true that the MDC's position is that the erection of monuments is a return to primitive worship of human beings. This is a mistaken view. every society has heroes and these heroes serve as inspirational figures in times of crises. If you do not revere your own, your children will revere foreign heroes.
Peace.
---
Ken Mufuka is a Zimbabwean patriot. He writes from the US.
Source - the standard
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
