The Danger of Hungry Women Delving In Zimbabwean Politics

Anger, Vengeance, Vulgar, Political Power all concocted in any woman who has no husband is a menu for disaster. Women of any age below 75 who have no husbands or have husbands below the description of a stud, should not be allowed to delve in politics.

Politics is a dangerous field where the elected leader controls and directs the ARMED FORCES! Such a leader has got to be humbly, self-restraint and highly considerate. Such a leader has to exhibit the ability to think independently and without the external influence from negative biological dictates or past bad experiences.  

Since the 1986 Beijing Conference for Women about  Equality, Development and Peace, Zimbabwe has experienced a paradigm shift to the negative direction. The conference gave birth to a rise of single unrestrained mothers in our communities which was not the case in our culture. Family values and social outlook suffered as a result of something that was designed to advance social life.

 The 1986 Conference was aiming at uplifting women equality status in all walks of life including politics. To some lengths, women general lifestyles have changed for the better and we uploud that. The problem is that the researchers of Gender Equality failed to draw concise limitations as to what biological limitations naturally exist where women should not be allowed to delve. The researchers pretended to know better than Ontology. All old cultures and books like the bible do put limits to what women can and cannot do. Gender Equality Researchers claim to know better than bibles and various cultures and the result we see is some women irreversibly destroying their lives.

Real life practice has proven that by virtue of their biological construct, women need to identify where they are not constructed to fit in.

It is naïve to claim that men and women are equal in everything and equally naïve to suggest that men are always good in everything. There are certain things where men should never be allowed to delve since women excel in those fields.

Politics is a highly sensitive area which costs lives and dire poverty to a large number of innocent citizens if mishandled. Boys who were brought up by single mothers in the absence of a father also generally exhibit that character of their mothers which is feminine (Not to provoke the unfortunate please). For example, if a single mother has a hatred for a certain tribe because a certain woman within that tribe stole her husband, that hatred is passed to the son 100% and it's indelible. You end up with a boy whose mind is full of feminine vengeance.

In Politics, the only single women who should be allowed to contest for Presidency should be those aged over 75. This is so because the issue of sexual deficits does not result in emotions and destructiveness in that category of women due to their advanced ages.

Women aged less than 75 who have no a sexually talented tend partners are dangerous in politics. Lack of good sex makes them destroy everything through emotionally careless talk. They are full of revenge and when they talk; their minds are full of violence and threats. They are dangerous extremists because naturally their hungry bodies yean to release that accumulated dielectrically charged element within which has two ways to get out.

The only two ways to release that dielectric charge is by a good sexual experience or by unleashing insults, vulgar and violent threats directed to a perceived rival at the loudest possible voice pitch. That is the nature of most sexually starved women. If they have no political power and have this starvation, they become a problem in the community. Their behaviour can result in multi deaths. They are more aggressive than the worst violent man.Their style of communication is very different from the style of married women who are sexually content.

This is the negative behaviour also exhibited by women in polygamous marriages. These women share one man who claims that he can sexually satisfy them all. The reality on the ground is that such women are angry, violent, discontented, aggressive, abusive, loud and temper-less. The women next door who has a sexually talented single man exhibits a humble, caring, normal, collected, inspirational, example of a socially good woman. A wife of a sexually talented and honest man has the characteristic that is emulate able.  Even the manner she raises her children is good. The goodness spills to the children creating a good country. Such good women CAN BECOME A GOOD PRESIDENT of a successful country but provided that country is already stable.

The 1986 Beijing Equality Conference failed to stipulate and table these concise facts and just threw an empty challenge to be dangerously tested on the field. Zimbabwe should refuse to be ruled by negative dielectric charge. We will get from the BAD in which we are to the WORSE if we fail to follow old customs and choose to experiment on untested and imminent danger in front of us now.

The only woman to contest for Presidential Positions should be married to a healthy man and her temper should be assessed to make sure that she will not lead our country into violence. The setback of happily married wives is that they are humble, maybe too humble to be able to tackle hard challenges faced by Zimbabwe now. The paradox of all this concludes that Zimbabwe is not ready for a female President. We have a choice between a humble ineffective housewife and a dangerously starved moto-mouth whose behaviour and conduct is not different from violently drunk ladies of the night.

If we choose to experiment on these loud and aggressive women, we will regret for even longer and even the worst enemies of Mugabe will wish Mugabe was the country's President.