Opinion / Columnist
Cars for Zimbabwean ministers - Luxurygate: The facts
13 Sep 2011 at 14:36hrs | Views
There have been reports in the press of late about unjustified expenditure of motor vehicles for Cabinet Ministers and senior government officials. Indeed it is the duty of the press in a democratic society to oversee the State and excesses of government.
A vibrant media that is not indebted to any political organisation is the cornerstone of any democracy.
However, to the extent that the Press is the Fourth Estate which plays a critical role in any society, it has an obligation to be fair, impartial, objective and accurate. That is why every journalist is taught the value of public interest, privileged and truth.
Public interest is key but it is not best served by mistruths and sensationalism.
In 2010, the Government of Zimbabwe set aside $1,5 million for the purchase of off‐road vehicles for Cabinet Ministers and other senior Government officials. The money was disbursed to the Ministry of Transport in December 2010. CMED, a private company, has proceeded to acquire the vehicles which are a condition of service for Cabinet Ministers.
Since January 2011, the Ministry of Finance has been gazetting accounts following the procurement of vehicles for education officers, health officials and other key departments in line with allocations in the 2011 budget. There has been no allocation for Cabinet ministers in 2011 and the off‐road vehicles, procured this year from the allocation in 2010, are for outreach duties.
Like all civil servants, whose plight everyone concedes must be improved; Cabinet Ministers are not on meaningful salary. Their salary does not include any allowances such as housing and education because of the limited fiscal space.
However, the so‐called Luxurygate teaches all of us important lessons.
Firstly, that there must be transparency in the conditions of service, remuneration and other perks for all senior officers. While the current law says only the President's salary should be gazetted, perhaps we need greater transparency where all remuneration and benefits for everyone in Government are made public so that there is no room for speculation.
Secondly, it is important for everyone in public service, including Cabinet Ministers, to declare their assets and for the Government to have a comprehensive and vehicle policy.
The bottom line is that civil servants and Cabinet Ministers must be well remunerated so that they are able to buy vehicles from their own salary. In the face accusations of profligacy, the Prime Minister, as the head of Government charged with the responsibility of formulating and implementing
Government policy, has sought to clarify the cost and the context of the procurement of the alleged vehicles. The Government should not operate as a secretive enclave. In the public interest, the Ministry of Transport should state the full facts, the number of vehicles procured and the total cost to the taxpayer.
A vibrant media that is not indebted to any political organisation is the cornerstone of any democracy.
However, to the extent that the Press is the Fourth Estate which plays a critical role in any society, it has an obligation to be fair, impartial, objective and accurate. That is why every journalist is taught the value of public interest, privileged and truth.
Public interest is key but it is not best served by mistruths and sensationalism.
In 2010, the Government of Zimbabwe set aside $1,5 million for the purchase of off‐road vehicles for Cabinet Ministers and other senior Government officials. The money was disbursed to the Ministry of Transport in December 2010. CMED, a private company, has proceeded to acquire the vehicles which are a condition of service for Cabinet Ministers.
Since January 2011, the Ministry of Finance has been gazetting accounts following the procurement of vehicles for education officers, health officials and other key departments in line with allocations in the 2011 budget. There has been no allocation for Cabinet ministers in 2011 and the off‐road vehicles, procured this year from the allocation in 2010, are for outreach duties.
Like all civil servants, whose plight everyone concedes must be improved; Cabinet Ministers are not on meaningful salary. Their salary does not include any allowances such as housing and education because of the limited fiscal space.
However, the so‐called Luxurygate teaches all of us important lessons.
Firstly, that there must be transparency in the conditions of service, remuneration and other perks for all senior officers. While the current law says only the President's salary should be gazetted, perhaps we need greater transparency where all remuneration and benefits for everyone in Government are made public so that there is no room for speculation.
Secondly, it is important for everyone in public service, including Cabinet Ministers, to declare their assets and for the Government to have a comprehensive and vehicle policy.
The bottom line is that civil servants and Cabinet Ministers must be well remunerated so that they are able to buy vehicles from their own salary. In the face accusations of profligacy, the Prime Minister, as the head of Government charged with the responsibility of formulating and implementing
Government policy, has sought to clarify the cost and the context of the procurement of the alleged vehicles. The Government should not operate as a secretive enclave. In the public interest, the Ministry of Transport should state the full facts, the number of vehicles procured and the total cost to the taxpayer.
Source - Spokesperson, office of the Prime Minister
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
