Woman's arrest over Vuzu party sparks debate on corporal punishment

The arrest and conviction of Panashe Mpofu, a Bulawayo woman who disciplined teenagers, including her own child, for hosting a Vuzu party, has reignited discussions on the legality and ethics of corporal punishment in Zimbabwe.

Mpofu was sentenced to two years in prison on November 14 for disciplining the teens at a party in Luveve suburb. Vuzu parties, known for underage drinking, drug use, and sexual activities, are self-funded gatherings often held without parental knowledge.

Mpofu's case drew public outcry, with many viewing her imprisonment as unjust given the circumstances. She was recently set free by Bulawayo High Court judge Justice Evangelista Kabasa, who reviewed and overturned the conviction.

The incident has polarized opinions, with some calling for the reinstatement of corporal punishment as a disciplinary measure.

Raymond Majongwe, secretary-general of the Progressive Teachers Union of Zimbabwe, argued that corporal punishment instills discipline and Ubuntu in children.

"This is the only way our children will learn discipline. We must not bow to foreign influence by removing corporal punishment," Majongwe said.

Winos Dube, chairperson of the Bulawayo United Residents Association, echoed similar sentiments, criticizing the younger generation's aversion to physical discipline.
"This must be revisited. Unlike previous generations, today's children view corporal punishment as abuse," Dube stated.

Local councillor Nkosinathi Hove Mpofu also supported corporal punishment, describing it as a form of love and guidance. "It's a way to mould children into better individuals," he said.

Methodist pastor Bhekithemba Phiri suggested a balanced approach. "Minimum punishment is helpful. Many from the older generation are disciplined today because of corporal punishment," he noted.

However, not everyone agrees. Critics of corporal punishment argue that it may do more harm than good.

Obert Masaraure, leader of the Amalgamated Rural Teachers Union of Zimbabwe, emphasized that physical punishment is not an effective deterrent.
"Studies show it increases anxiety and depression, which can worsen substance abuse and other issues," he said.

Legal challenges have also shaped the debate. In 2023, Justice Munamato Mutevedzi ruled that corporal punishment could not be classified as assault if intended for discipline. However, Section 68A of the Constitution outlaws corporal punishment in schools, citing prohibitions against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.

Mpofu's case highlights the tension between traditional disciplinary practices and evolving societal and legal norms. The role of parents, educators, and the community in addressing problematic behaviors, like those seen at Vuzu parties, remains a contentious issue.

As Zimbabwe grapples with this debate, the balance between maintaining discipline and respecting children's rights will likely remain at the forefront of public discourse.