Bulawayo residents back tougher litter fines

The Bulawayo City Council's proposal to increase fines for littering has been met with general approval from residents and stakeholders, though some have expressed concern that the suggested 1 000 percent hike could be excessive.

Littering has become an increasingly visible problem across the city, from residential neighborhoods to the central business district. Currently, fines range from Level 1 ($5) to Level 3 ($30), but councillors argue that the penalties are no longer a sufficient deterrent, particularly for companies.

During the latest full council meeting, councillors tasked the Health, Housing and Education Committee, chaired by Ward 17 Councillor Sikhululekile Moyo, with urgently reviewing the matter and making recommendations.

Michael Ndiweni, director of the Bulawayo Vendors and Traders Association, expressed strong support for the proposed increase, saying it aligns with global environmental standards. "It's a very good recommendation. Even the Kyoto Protocol says the polluter pays. It is your responsibility to keep the city clean. I fully support council because I think there are no effective or punitive measures for littering, including for companies," Ndiweni said.

However, not all residents agree that the jump to a $300 penalty is appropriate. Winos Dube, chairperson of the Bulawayo Residents Association (BURA), suggested a more moderate increase to $50. "For starters, we do not condone littering. However, increasing fines from $30 to $300 is too harsh. We understand the intention is to deter people, but what about someone who mistakenly litters? Will they be able to pay such an amount?" he asked.

Concerns about corruption in enforcement were also raised. Pelanda West resident Chengeto Rwizi said while she supports higher fines, she worries that officers could exploit the system. "It's good for the fines to go up, but I foresee a situation where innocent people may be accused of littering and officers demand ‘freedom money' far less than the official fine. The proposal is noble—our city must regain its status—but enforcement must be fair," Rwizi said.

The council is expected to deliberate further before finalising the new fine structure, balancing the need to deter littering with fairness and practicality for residents and businesses alike.