Latest News Editor's Choice


Opinion / Columnist

While Zimbabwe Watches Power and Wealth, Malaria Continues to Kill

2 hrs ago | 40 Views
In recent weeks, Zimbabwe's public discourse has been dominated by two subjects, the extraordinary display of wealth at businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei's wedding and the increasingly contentious debate surrounding proposed constitutional amendments. Social media, newsrooms, and political circles have devoted countless hours to discussing both.

Yet beyond the spotlight, another story has been unfolding one measured not in headlines or political influence, but in human lives.Malaria is once again tightening its grip on some of Zimbabwe's most vulnerable communities, particularly in rural farming and mining areas. The disease, which many in urban centres regard as a routine seasonal challenge, remains a deadly threat for thousands of citizens living far from the country's centres of power and wealth.

A few days ago I watched Haru Mutasa cover the wrath of malaria in Guruve but just as the international media documented the crisis affecting farming and mining communities, reports emerged that in sabhuku Kawara's village a man succumbed to malaria. A spike in malaria cases is visible especially this time of the year but deaths are alarmingly unusual. 

The tragedy is compounded by history. The discovery of quinine in the seventeenth century was one of humanity's greatest medical breakthroughs, fundamentally altering the course of exploration, trade, and imperial expansion. Entire colonial campaigns that would once have been impossible became feasible because a treatment for malaria existed.
Yet centuries later, the disease continues to kill people in rural Africa with alarming regularity.

This raises a difficult question: why does a disease that is both preventable and treatable remain so deadly?
Part of the answer lies in poverty. Malaria is often described as a tropical disease, but it is equally accurate to describe it as a disease of inequality. It disproportionately affects people whose homes offer limited protection against mosquitoes, whose communities lack adequate health infrastructure, and whose economic circumstances make preventative measures difficult to access.
The mosquito may not discriminate, but exposure does.

Those most vulnerable are often people living in grass-thatched homes near mosquito breeding sites, families with limited access to repellents and treated nets, and communities where healthcare facilities are distant or under-resourced.

Economic activity may also be contributing to increased exposure. Zimbabwe's expanding tobacco sector requires substantial labour during evening and nighttime hours when mosquitoes are most active. Farmers frequently work under conditions that increase the risk of bites. Similarly, artisanal miners often operate in remote, forested environments and around stagnant water sources that provide ideal breeding grounds for mosquito populations.

These factors alone do not explain every case, but they illustrate how economic necessity can inadvertently place vulnerable populations in the path of preventable disease.

The deeper issue, however, is one of national attention. Zimbabwe is capable of mobilising enormous public interest around politics, business, and elite affairs. Yet diseases that disproportionately affect the rural poor rarely command the same urgency. The result is a public conversation that often overlooks crises until they become impossible to ignore.
A nation's priorities are revealed not only by what it celebrates or debates, but also by what it neglects.

As Zimbabwe argues over constitutional amendments and marvels at displays of wealth, malaria continues its quiet advance through communities that seldom dominate the news cycle. For the families burying loved ones, there is little comfort in knowing that their tragedy was overshadowed by more fashionable national conversations.

The measure of a society is not found in the grandeur of its weddings or the intensity of its political disputes. It is found in whether preventable deaths among its most vulnerable citizens are treated as a national emergency or merely as background noise.

For many rural Zimbabweans, malaria remains exactly that test.

Source - Chakabva Kudakwashe
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
Join the discussion
Loading comments…

Get the Daily Digest