News / National
Controversy erupts over expulsion of grade 7 pupil from Bulawayo school
03 Jun 2025 at 14:52hrs | Views
A 13-year-old Grade 7 pupil at Robert Tredgold Primary School in Bulawayo has been expelled after a tribal led disciplinary committee found him guilty of four serious charges relating to misconduct between February and March 2025. The allegations include verbally abusing a teacher, physically assaulting fellow students, and using highly offensive language.
According to a document circulating on social media, the pupil reportedly insulted his class teacher on 27 March 2025, calling her "a dog" and "a lesbian." The following day, he allegedly directed degrading remarks at a fellow Grade 7 pupil, including the offensive claim that the classmate's parents "drink tea inside a condom." Physical violence was also recorded: on 19 February, the pupil struck another student on the eye and mouth, causing visible swelling. Further disruptive behavior was noted on 27 February while a senior teacher reprimanded him.
The tribal disciplinary committee recommended his expulsion, which took effect on 13 May 2025. The school justified the decision as necessary to restore order and maintain discipline. However, the disciplinary process and subsequent handling of the case have sparked serious debate.
Concerns have been raised about the breach of confidentiality, as the pupil's name was not protected in the leaked documents, which were reportedly circulated nationwide. This has led to calls for accountability for those responsible for the leak.
Moreover, questions have emerged about the involvement of the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education in the disciplinary and expulsion process. It appears the expulsion may not only apply to Robert Tredgold Primary but could bar the pupil from all schools in the country's education system.
Critics argue that the case highlights deeper issues around how disciplinary matters are managed. They question whether the pupil received any intervention or support before being excluded. Given that the pupil is reportedly an average performer with potential, some experts say his behaviour may be a cry for help, suggesting psychological or counseling services should have been involved.
"The child has a right to education regardless of behavior," said one education advocate. "Excluding him from the entire school system flies in the face of that right. The best interests of the learner must be prioritized."
This case raises important questions about balancing discipline, confidentiality, and support within Zimbabwe's education system, and whether more holistic approaches are needed to help pupils struggling with behavioural challenges.
According to a document circulating on social media, the pupil reportedly insulted his class teacher on 27 March 2025, calling her "a dog" and "a lesbian." The following day, he allegedly directed degrading remarks at a fellow Grade 7 pupil, including the offensive claim that the classmate's parents "drink tea inside a condom." Physical violence was also recorded: on 19 February, the pupil struck another student on the eye and mouth, causing visible swelling. Further disruptive behavior was noted on 27 February while a senior teacher reprimanded him.
The tribal disciplinary committee recommended his expulsion, which took effect on 13 May 2025. The school justified the decision as necessary to restore order and maintain discipline. However, the disciplinary process and subsequent handling of the case have sparked serious debate.
Concerns have been raised about the breach of confidentiality, as the pupil's name was not protected in the leaked documents, which were reportedly circulated nationwide. This has led to calls for accountability for those responsible for the leak.
Critics argue that the case highlights deeper issues around how disciplinary matters are managed. They question whether the pupil received any intervention or support before being excluded. Given that the pupil is reportedly an average performer with potential, some experts say his behaviour may be a cry for help, suggesting psychological or counseling services should have been involved.
"The child has a right to education regardless of behavior," said one education advocate. "Excluding him from the entire school system flies in the face of that right. The best interests of the learner must be prioritized."
This case raises important questions about balancing discipline, confidentiality, and support within Zimbabwe's education system, and whether more holistic approaches are needed to help pupils struggling with behavioural challenges.
Source - online
