Chiminya warns legal action over Munhumutapa title disputes

Timothy Chiminya, who was previously declared King Munhumutapa by the High Court in a 2022 ruling, has threatened legal action against anyone who questions his title or refers to him as an impostor or self-proclaimed monarch.

In a letter circulated to various institutions, including the Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs, the Attorney General's Office and the Constitutional Court, Chiminya warned that defamatory statements about his status would not go unchallenged.

"I, King Munhumutapa/Monomutapa warn that anyone claiming that I am self-proclaimed or an impostor via newspapers, social media or any other platform, will face legal action and be held liable for defamation," he said.

He further cautioned against any individual using the Munhumutapa title without his authorisation, stating that such actions would also attract legal consequences.

"I also warn that anyone claiming to be or referring to themselves as King Munhumutapa without my authorisation will be held liable and face legal action," he added.

Chiminya, who claims spiritual appointment as the reincarnated Munhumutapa, says he presides over a "Zimbabwe Kingdom." The historical Mutapa Empire, which existed between the 15th century and the 18th century, once covered large parts of present-day Zimbabwe and extended into neighbouring territories.

The High Court's 2022 ruling, which Chiminya relies on, followed his legal challenge against the Ministry of Local Government and Public Works. However, his claims have remained controversial, with ongoing disputes over the scope and recognition of his authority.

Over the years, his assertions have repeatedly drawn attention from state authorities. He has previously faced arrest and prosecution linked to statements interpreted as undermining the authority of President Emmerson Mnangagwa, before later being released.

Chiminya has also written to government authorities demanding remuneration and benefits similar to those accorded to traditional chiefs, further fuelling debate around his claims.

His latest warning signals a renewed legal push to defend his asserted status as he continues to challenge public criticism of his identity and role.