Opinion / Columnist
Unquenched appetite for a one-party state
3 hrs ago |
56 Views
ZIMBABWE appears forever caught in a cycle of promise and retreat. Periods of optimism are regularly followed by disappointment, leaving the country politically exhausted, economically fragile and socially strained. Progress seems visible from afar, but closer scrutiny often reveals a familiar pattern - three steps forward and four backwards.
The country's troubles are not entirely the product of sanctions, external pressures or unfavourable global conditions. Many of the wounds are self-inflicted. Zimbabwe has repeatedly struggled to confront the deeper governance issues that have haunted it since Independence.
Authorities have been reluctant to embrace reforms, strengthen institutions and entrench the rule of law. Action often comes only after crises have reached dangerous levels.
The debate surrounding Constitutional Amendment No. 3 Bill has once again brought into focus a larger and more enduring issue. Beyond the legal arguments lies a question that has defi ned Zimbabwe's post-Independence history.
Is the country committed to constitutional democracy, or does an enduring appetite for a one-party state still shape political thinking?
The desire to consolidate power did not disappear with former president Robert Mugabe. It has outlived personalities and administrations.
Throughout the years, elections have frequently produced disputes, political tensions and accusations of unfairness. Institutions that ought to serve the nation impartially have often appeared subordinate to political interests.
No country prospers when individuals overshadow institutions. Successful nations are built on strong systems, predictable rules and equal application of the law. Zimbabwe, however, has too often relied on personalities rather than institutions, and the consequences have been costly.
Corruption has become deeply entrenched, enriching a privileged few while depriving the country of resources needed for development.
Public contracts and tenders have repeatedly attracted controversy, while perceptions of favouritism have weakened confidence in the economy. Investors do not simply seek opportunities; they seek certainty, transparency and fairness. Where these are absent, capital naturally migrates elsewhere.
Policy inconsistency has compounded these problems. Frequent shifts in regulations and past currency experiments have undermined confidence and complicated long-term planning.
Businesses and investors require predictability.
They need assurance that today's rules will not be overturned tomorrow. Without such certainty, economic growth becomes difficult to sustain.
With most economic activity now taking place outside the formal system, government has struggled to broaden the tax base and mobilise resources for public services. Informality may provide livelihoods for millions, but it also highlights the inability of the formal economy to generate sufficient opportunities.
The social consequences are increasingly visible. Poverty, unemployment and growing substance abuse have weakened communities and placed additional pressure on families and public institutions. A nation cannot aspire to prosper while its social fabric steadily frays.
Zimbabwe's ambitions of becoming an upper middle-income economy by 2030 will remain difficult to realise without addressing the underlying governance deficits that have undermined progress for decades.
Economic blueprints and ambitious targets are not enough.
Sustainable development requires respect for the rule of law, strong institutions, policy consistency and accountability. Zimbabwe is not short of potential. It possesses abundant natural resources, a resilient people and strategic advantages that many countries would envy. But potential alone does not guarantee prosperity.
The country's future will depend on whether its leaders embrace inclusive governance and democratic institutions, or remain captive to the old temptation of political dominance.
Until that question is resolved, Zimbabwe risks remaining trapped in the familiar cycle that has defi ned much of its post-Independence history — three steps forward and four backwards.
Wilson is leader of the Democratic Official Party.
The country's troubles are not entirely the product of sanctions, external pressures or unfavourable global conditions. Many of the wounds are self-inflicted. Zimbabwe has repeatedly struggled to confront the deeper governance issues that have haunted it since Independence.
Authorities have been reluctant to embrace reforms, strengthen institutions and entrench the rule of law. Action often comes only after crises have reached dangerous levels.
The debate surrounding Constitutional Amendment No. 3 Bill has once again brought into focus a larger and more enduring issue. Beyond the legal arguments lies a question that has defi ned Zimbabwe's post-Independence history.
Is the country committed to constitutional democracy, or does an enduring appetite for a one-party state still shape political thinking?
The desire to consolidate power did not disappear with former president Robert Mugabe. It has outlived personalities and administrations.
Throughout the years, elections have frequently produced disputes, political tensions and accusations of unfairness. Institutions that ought to serve the nation impartially have often appeared subordinate to political interests.
No country prospers when individuals overshadow institutions. Successful nations are built on strong systems, predictable rules and equal application of the law. Zimbabwe, however, has too often relied on personalities rather than institutions, and the consequences have been costly.
Corruption has become deeply entrenched, enriching a privileged few while depriving the country of resources needed for development.
Public contracts and tenders have repeatedly attracted controversy, while perceptions of favouritism have weakened confidence in the economy. Investors do not simply seek opportunities; they seek certainty, transparency and fairness. Where these are absent, capital naturally migrates elsewhere.
Policy inconsistency has compounded these problems. Frequent shifts in regulations and past currency experiments have undermined confidence and complicated long-term planning.
Businesses and investors require predictability.
They need assurance that today's rules will not be overturned tomorrow. Without such certainty, economic growth becomes difficult to sustain.
With most economic activity now taking place outside the formal system, government has struggled to broaden the tax base and mobilise resources for public services. Informality may provide livelihoods for millions, but it also highlights the inability of the formal economy to generate sufficient opportunities.
The social consequences are increasingly visible. Poverty, unemployment and growing substance abuse have weakened communities and placed additional pressure on families and public institutions. A nation cannot aspire to prosper while its social fabric steadily frays.
Zimbabwe's ambitions of becoming an upper middle-income economy by 2030 will remain difficult to realise without addressing the underlying governance deficits that have undermined progress for decades.
Economic blueprints and ambitious targets are not enough.
Sustainable development requires respect for the rule of law, strong institutions, policy consistency and accountability. Zimbabwe is not short of potential. It possesses abundant natural resources, a resilient people and strategic advantages that many countries would envy. But potential alone does not guarantee prosperity.
The country's future will depend on whether its leaders embrace inclusive governance and democratic institutions, or remain captive to the old temptation of political dominance.
Until that question is resolved, Zimbabwe risks remaining trapped in the familiar cycle that has defi ned much of its post-Independence history — three steps forward and four backwards.
Wilson is leader of the Democratic Official Party.
Source - The Standard
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
Join the discussion
Loading comments…
