News / National
Biti's 3rd ConCourt application turned down
09 Nov 2023 at 05:53hrs | Views
OPPOSITION politician Tendai Biti failed again yesterday to have points of law in his trial for verbal and threatening assault referred to the Constitutional Court, with Harare magistrate Mrs Vongai Guwuriro dismissing the application, saying she had an obligation to expedite matters.
Biti had his two previous applications of the same nature dismissed by the same magistrate.
He is facing charges of verbally assaulting businesswoman and investor Mrs Tatiana Aleshina, and threatening her, at the Harare Magistrates Court in 2020.
In dismissing the application, the magistrate said she had noted that Biti was making the same kind of application for the third time and was raising the same issues which he raised before, apparently to delay the court processes.
"The court will not allow him to make another application for the third time. The court needs to expedite matters in the interest of justice," said the magistrate.
Mrs Guwuriro said she needed to expedite the case otherwise it would be heard forever.
Biti, who is submitting his defence, had raised constitutional questions arguing that his constitutional rights were being infringed upon.
Deputy prosecutor general Mr Michael Reza counter-argued that Biti's application was frivolous and vexetious.
"He has made such applications before and they were dismissed. I don't know whether to cry or laugh because this application ought to be dismissed," said Mr Reza, adding that the court was now functus officio.
During the previous sitting, Biti insisted that he did not physically assault Mrs Aleshina.
The trial is now in its third year with the matter going on at snail's pace due to postponements and applications at the instigation of the defence.
Submitting his defence, Biti told the court that putting the charge on him as done by the State was invalid from a common law point of view. He said it was an infringement of his constitutional rights.
"Your Worship, if you say I'm an idiot, I will just laugh at you because the word means nothing to me," said Biti.
The State argues that while Biti did not physically assault Mrs Aleshina, the way he bore down on her in apparent rage, shouting and insulting her, induced such high levels of fear of physical assault that she needed medical treatment, and that a colleague of hers was so frightened that he interposed himself between Biti and Mrs Aleshina.
Biti had his two previous applications of the same nature dismissed by the same magistrate.
He is facing charges of verbally assaulting businesswoman and investor Mrs Tatiana Aleshina, and threatening her, at the Harare Magistrates Court in 2020.
In dismissing the application, the magistrate said she had noted that Biti was making the same kind of application for the third time and was raising the same issues which he raised before, apparently to delay the court processes.
"The court will not allow him to make another application for the third time. The court needs to expedite matters in the interest of justice," said the magistrate.
Mrs Guwuriro said she needed to expedite the case otherwise it would be heard forever.
Biti, who is submitting his defence, had raised constitutional questions arguing that his constitutional rights were being infringed upon.
"He has made such applications before and they were dismissed. I don't know whether to cry or laugh because this application ought to be dismissed," said Mr Reza, adding that the court was now functus officio.
During the previous sitting, Biti insisted that he did not physically assault Mrs Aleshina.
The trial is now in its third year with the matter going on at snail's pace due to postponements and applications at the instigation of the defence.
Submitting his defence, Biti told the court that putting the charge on him as done by the State was invalid from a common law point of view. He said it was an infringement of his constitutional rights.
"Your Worship, if you say I'm an idiot, I will just laugh at you because the word means nothing to me," said Biti.
The State argues that while Biti did not physically assault Mrs Aleshina, the way he bore down on her in apparent rage, shouting and insulting her, induced such high levels of fear of physical assault that she needed medical treatment, and that a colleague of hers was so frightened that he interposed himself between Biti and Mrs Aleshina.
Source - The Herald
