News / National
Mushohwe defends ZBC
03 Aug 2017 at 03:15hrs | Views
Information, Media and Broadcasting Services Minister Dr Christopher Mushohwe yesterday refuted allegations that the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation only covers Zanu-PF programmes, saying other political parties were welcome to seek coverage from the national broadcaster.
Dr Mushohwe was responding to a question from Harare West legislator Ms Jessie Majome in the National Assembly on why ZBC content seemed to favour the ruling party's programmes, asking if it was its editorial policy.
"I want to thank the member for that politically-motivated question," he said.
"The ZBC is a public and national broadcast and it is available for anybody and everyone in this country or beyond. I
"If zanu-pf has more programmes than other political parties that ZBC covers, it is not the problem of ZBC. Let those political parties go out there and ask ZBC to cover them and (if) ZBC refuses, let me know.
"If you do not have programmes and the ZBC does not know that there is a programme that is taking place, it is not their problem, if they do, they cover."
Dr Mushohwe said if informed, ZBC stood ready to cover any worthy programmes or activities by the opposition, which he said the national broadcaster was already doing.
Responding to a written question by Nketa legislator Phelela Masuku, Dr Mushohwe justified licence fees being charged by ZBC, saying the national broadcaster had high production and transmission costs because it was still using the analogue system.
Dr Mushohwe said most public broadcasters in the region received grants from their governments, which assisted in meeting production costs, while ZBC did not receive such grants.
"Whether the national broadcasting grid is digitalised or analogue, it is a fact that digital frequency is cheaper to run than analogue frequency as digital frequency spectrum brings about what is called the digital dividend which brings about economies of scale and scope which also brings down costs, thus supporting licensing fees," he said.
"The rates are on the high side as compared to regional rates, with SABC charging about $25, Zambia $18 and Botswana $15.
"It must be noted that all these nations are ahead of Zimbabwe in as far as digitalisation is concerned, hence lower cost of transmission as compared to the one in Zimbabwe, where maintenance costs for analogue system are exorbitant."
Dr Mushohwe was responding to a question from Harare West legislator Ms Jessie Majome in the National Assembly on why ZBC content seemed to favour the ruling party's programmes, asking if it was its editorial policy.
"I want to thank the member for that politically-motivated question," he said.
"The ZBC is a public and national broadcast and it is available for anybody and everyone in this country or beyond. I
"If zanu-pf has more programmes than other political parties that ZBC covers, it is not the problem of ZBC. Let those political parties go out there and ask ZBC to cover them and (if) ZBC refuses, let me know.
"If you do not have programmes and the ZBC does not know that there is a programme that is taking place, it is not their problem, if they do, they cover."
Responding to a written question by Nketa legislator Phelela Masuku, Dr Mushohwe justified licence fees being charged by ZBC, saying the national broadcaster had high production and transmission costs because it was still using the analogue system.
Dr Mushohwe said most public broadcasters in the region received grants from their governments, which assisted in meeting production costs, while ZBC did not receive such grants.
"Whether the national broadcasting grid is digitalised or analogue, it is a fact that digital frequency is cheaper to run than analogue frequency as digital frequency spectrum brings about what is called the digital dividend which brings about economies of scale and scope which also brings down costs, thus supporting licensing fees," he said.
"The rates are on the high side as compared to regional rates, with SABC charging about $25, Zambia $18 and Botswana $15.
"It must be noted that all these nations are ahead of Zimbabwe in as far as digitalisation is concerned, hence lower cost of transmission as compared to the one in Zimbabwe, where maintenance costs for analogue system are exorbitant."
Source - the herald
