Will South Africa's anti-migrant wave reduce Zimbabwe's diaspora lifeline?

The resurgence of anti-migrant sentiment in South Africa has understandably triggered anxiety in Zimbabwe. Images of demonstrations, calls for tighter immigration enforcement, and reports of migrants fleeing certain communities have prompted an inevitable question: Will Zimbabwe suffer a decline in remittances if Zimbabweans in South Africa come under increasing pressure?

Send more with Tayo Pay.

At first glance, the answer appears obvious. South Africa hosts the largest concentration of Zimbabwean migrants in the world. Logic suggests that if Zimbabweans lose jobs, return home prematurely, or face growing hostility, the billions of dollars flowing back into Zimbabwe each year would inevitably decline.
Yet economics is often more nuanced than politics. While the current anti-migrant climate undoubtedly poses risks to thousands of Zimbabwean workers, it does not necessarily follow that Zimbabwe's overall remittance inflows will experience a dramatic or sustained decline. Indeed, there are compelling reasons to believe that remittances could prove far more resilient than many expect—and under certain circumstances may even increase.

The diaspora is larger than South Africa

Public debate often treats the Zimbabwean diaspora as though it exists almost exclusively in South Africa. This is understandable because South Africa has historically hosted the largest number of Zimbabwean migrants.

However, remittance values tell a more sophisticated story.

Recent diaspora remittance data shows that while South Africa remains one of Zimbabwe's largest remittance corridors, the United Kingdom has emerged as an equally significant—and in some periods even larger—source of remittance value. The United States, Australia, Canada, Ireland and several other countries also contribute substantial inflows. Zimbabwe received approximately US$2.45 billion in remittances during 2025, representing another year of strong growth despite global economic uncertainty.

This illustrates an important point.

The value of remittances is not determined simply by where the greatest number of Zimbabweans reside. It is heavily influenced by who earns the highest incomes.

Professionals drive high-value remittances

Zimbabwe's migration story has evolved considerably over the past two decades.

The first major migration waves consisted largely of workers seeking immediate employment opportunities in neighbouring South Africa. Subsequent waves increasingly included nurses, doctors, engineers, accountants, lecturers, IT professionals, artisans and other skilled workers who relocated to countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States.




This professional diaspora generally enjoys higher earnings, greater employment security and stronger legal status than many migrants engaged in low-income or informal work.
Consequently, they possess significantly greater disposable income.

While a farm worker or casual labourer in South Africa may remit relatively modest monthly amounts, a healthcare professional in Britain or an engineer in Australia can often remit substantially more.

In other words, remittance value is concentrated among income earners rather than migrant numbers.

This explains why countries with much smaller Zimbabwean populations can rival South Africa in total remittance contributions.

South Africa still matters

This should not be interpreted as minimising South Africa's importance.

Far from it.

South Africa remains Zimbabwe's closest economic partner and one of its most important remittance corridors. Treasury estimates indicate that South Africa accounted for roughly 30% of formal remittances in 2024, with the UK contributing a comparable share.

Moreover, South Africa's contribution extends beyond formal money transfers.



Thousands of Zimbabweans support relatives by purchasing groceries, school uniforms, medicines, building materials and household goods, often transported through informal logistics networks. These forms of assistance are difficult to capture in official remittance statistics but remain economically significant.

Should anti-migrant tensions intensify, these informal support systems could indeed face disruption.

That risk is real.

Panic does not always reduce remittances

There is another economic dynamic that deserves greater attention.

Periods of uncertainty frequently lead migrants to send more, not less, money home.

International evidence shows that remittances often rise during crises affecting either the country of origin or migrants themselves. Families respond by increasing financial support, treating remittances as an informal insurance mechanism.

This behaviour may prove especially relevant today.

Zimbabweans facing uncertainty about their long-term future in South Africa may begin reassessing their financial priorities.

Instead of concentrating investment in South Africa, they may increasingly channel savings into Zimbabwe.

Investing for an eventual homecoming

This is perhaps the most overlooked consequence of the current anti-migrant climate.

Migrants who once intended to settle permanently abroad may begin preparing for eventual return.

That preparation requires investment.
Land purchases.
Residential housing.
Commercial properties.
Small businesses.
Agricultural projects.
Rental developments.
Education for children back home.

Rather than simply sending money for groceries or school fees, migrants may begin transferring larger sums to build assets that secure their long-term future.

In behavioural economics this is known as precautionary investment—the tendency to create financial security when future circumstances become uncertain.

For Zimbabwe, precautionary investment could offset some of the reduction in ordinary household remittances.

The professional diaspora is relatively secure

Another reason against overly pessimistic projections lies in the structure of Zimbabwe's overseas workforce.

Anti-migrant rhetoric tends to affect vulnerable migrants most severely—those working informally, without documentation, or in sectors exposed to public hostility.

Many professionals occupy a different position.

Doctors, nurses, academics, engineers, accountants and technology specialists are generally employed under formal contracts, possess recognised qualifications, and often enjoy legal residency or permanent immigration status.

This professional class is unlikely to experience mass displacement.

Consequently, one of Zimbabwe's highest-value remittance sources remains comparatively stable.

South Africa also needs migrant labour

The current political discourse sometimes overlooks an inconvenient economic reality.

South Africa depends heavily on migrant labour across numerous industries, including agriculture, construction, logistics, hospitality, retail and domestic services.

Recent analyses warn that large-scale departures of migrant workers could create labour shortages and economic disruption within South Africa itself. Studies continue to find limited evidence that migrants systematically displace local workers, while many sectors rely on their skills and labour.

Political rhetoric may therefore prove more dramatic than actual economic outcomes.

Governments often balance domestic political pressures against labour market realities.

Formal remittance channels continue improving

Another encouraging development concerns payment infrastructure.

Regional financial institutions continue working to reduce the cost and increase the speed of cross-border payments.

The South Africa-Zimbabwe corridor remains a priority for improving affordability, interoperability and financial inclusion, while banks and payment providers are introducing new cross-border platforms aimed at making remittances faster and cheaper.

Lower transaction costs generally encourage higher use of formal channels.

That could partially compensate for any reduction in migrant numbers.

Zimbabwe's challenge

Whether remittances decline or grow ultimately depends not only on developments in South Africa but also on conditions inside Zimbabwe.

Migrants invest where they perceive opportunity.

If Zimbabwe strengthens property rights, deepens financial markets, improves ease of doing business and creates attractive investment vehicles for the diaspora, precautionary savings generated abroad could increasingly flow into productive domestic investment.

If those opportunities remain limited, migrants may simply redirect savings elsewhere.

The diaspora's willingness to invest is therefore only half the equation.

Zimbabwe's investment climate is the other half.

Beyond fear

The instinctive reaction to South Africa's anti-migrant wave is to predict economic disaster for Zimbabwe.

That conclusion may be premature.

Certainly, individual migrants - particularly those working in vulnerable sectors - face genuine hardship and uncertainty. Some families may experience reduced income if employment opportunities shrink or migration becomes more difficult.

Yet Zimbabwe's remittance economy has become increasingly diversified, both geographically and economically.

High-income professionals remain securely established across multiple global destinations.

Remittances have historically demonstrated remarkable resilience during periods of crisis.

And uncertainty itself may encourage migrants to accelerate investments back home as insurance against an unpredictable future.

The real question may therefore not be whether remittances collapse.

Rather, it is whether Zimbabwe can convert precautionary diaspora transfers into lasting domestic investment.

If that happens, today's anti-migrant politics in South Africa could inadvertently strengthen tomorrow's economic foundations in Zimbabwe.

History has repeatedly shown that migration is not simply about movement. It is about adaptation. And if there is one characteristic that has consistently defined Zimbabwe's global diaspora, it is its remarkable ability to adapt, preserve family ties, and continue supporting the country they still call home - even when the world around them grows increasingly uncertain.

------------------
Tayo Pay (Pty) Ltd is an Authorised Dealer in Foreign Exchange with Limited Authority (ADLA), licensed and regulated by the Financial Surveillance Department of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB).