News / Africa
UN divided on a Libyan no fly zone
15 Mar 2011 at 06:00hrs | Views
A divided U.N. Security Council has discussed the idea of authorizing a no-fly zone over Libya, but no consensus emerged among its 15 members and Russia said it had questions about the proposal.
France, which along with Britain has led calls for an enforced ban on military flights across the North African oil-producing state, said it hoped the Arab League decision to ask the council to impose a no-fly zone would persuade reluctant members to support it.
"Now that there is this Arab League statement, we do hope that it's a game changer for the other members of the council," French U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said before the closed-door council meeting.
After the inconclusive meeting finished, Araud said he was still hopeful of getting a no-fly zone resolution approved.
"It's possible," he said. "There was no total refusal. There were concerns, questions, but I think we are moving forward." He said the council should act with greater urgency given the situation on the ground in Libya, where forces loyal to leader Muammar Gaddafi have launched a fierce counter-offensive against rebels trying to oust him and end his 41-year rule.
"We would prefer to act as quickly as possible, and we want that our partners on the council have the same sense of urgency that we have," he said. "That's the small regret that I have." Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told reporters that the council was not yet in a position to vote on a no-fly zone and a number of council members needed more information.
"Fundamental questions need to be answered, not just what we need to do, but how it's going to be done," he said. "If there is a no-fly zone, who is going to implement (it) ...
Without those details or answers to those questions, it's very hard to make a responsible decision."
NO COMMENT FROM US
Churkin added that Moscow remained "open-minded" and had not rejected the idea of a no-fly zone.
German Ambassador Peter Wittig said Berlin supports toughening the sanctions approved on Feb. 26 by the Security Council against Gaddafi, his family and inner circle. He was more skeptical about the idea of a no-fly zone.
"Questions were raised," he said. "We raised some questions and some of the questions are still unanswered." The delegation of the United States, which is undecided on whether to support a no-fly zone, left the council chambers without commenting to reporters gathered there.
Lebanese Ambassador Nawaf Salam, the sole Arab representative on the council, told reporters his delegation would be helping to prepare a draft resolution.
"The council will be reconvening soon to further
discuss the matter and hopefully make a decision in that regard soon," he told reporters after the meeting.
He said Lebanon wanted the council "to act as swiftly as possible" on the question of a no-fly zone.
"We think it is not only a legitimate request, it is a necessary request. Measures ought to be taken to stop the violence, to put an end to the ... situation in Libya, to protect the civilians there," he said.
He added that it was impossible to say whether a no-fly zone would work or not. "These are questions one cannot answer now," he said.
In addition to the United States, Germany and Russia, other skeptics on the no-fly zone issue include South Africa and Brazil, diplomats told Reuters.
In order to pass, council resolutions need nine votes in favor and no vetoes from the five permanent members. NATO, the most likely candidate for enforcing a no-fly zone, has made clear that Security Council authorization would be required if it was to get involved in such an operation.
France, which along with Britain has led calls for an enforced ban on military flights across the North African oil-producing state, said it hoped the Arab League decision to ask the council to impose a no-fly zone would persuade reluctant members to support it.
"Now that there is this Arab League statement, we do hope that it's a game changer for the other members of the council," French U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said before the closed-door council meeting.
After the inconclusive meeting finished, Araud said he was still hopeful of getting a no-fly zone resolution approved.
"It's possible," he said. "There was no total refusal. There were concerns, questions, but I think we are moving forward." He said the council should act with greater urgency given the situation on the ground in Libya, where forces loyal to leader Muammar Gaddafi have launched a fierce counter-offensive against rebels trying to oust him and end his 41-year rule.
"We would prefer to act as quickly as possible, and we want that our partners on the council have the same sense of urgency that we have," he said. "That's the small regret that I have." Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told reporters that the council was not yet in a position to vote on a no-fly zone and a number of council members needed more information.
"Fundamental questions need to be answered, not just what we need to do, but how it's going to be done," he said. "If there is a no-fly zone, who is going to implement (it) ...
Without those details or answers to those questions, it's very hard to make a responsible decision."
NO COMMENT FROM US
Churkin added that Moscow remained "open-minded" and had not rejected the idea of a no-fly zone.
German Ambassador Peter Wittig said Berlin supports toughening the sanctions approved on Feb. 26 by the Security Council against Gaddafi, his family and inner circle. He was more skeptical about the idea of a no-fly zone.
"Questions were raised," he said. "We raised some questions and some of the questions are still unanswered." The delegation of the United States, which is undecided on whether to support a no-fly zone, left the council chambers without commenting to reporters gathered there.
Lebanese Ambassador Nawaf Salam, the sole Arab representative on the council, told reporters his delegation would be helping to prepare a draft resolution.
"The council will be reconvening soon to further
discuss the matter and hopefully make a decision in that regard soon," he told reporters after the meeting.
He said Lebanon wanted the council "to act as swiftly as possible" on the question of a no-fly zone.
"We think it is not only a legitimate request, it is a necessary request. Measures ought to be taken to stop the violence, to put an end to the ... situation in Libya, to protect the civilians there," he said.
He added that it was impossible to say whether a no-fly zone would work or not. "These are questions one cannot answer now," he said.
In addition to the United States, Germany and Russia, other skeptics on the no-fly zone issue include South Africa and Brazil, diplomats told Reuters.
In order to pass, council resolutions need nine votes in favor and no vetoes from the five permanent members. NATO, the most likely candidate for enforcing a no-fly zone, has made clear that Security Council authorization would be required if it was to get involved in such an operation.
Source - Byo24News