News / National
More funding woes for Zimbabwe NGOs
3 hrs ago | Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83f52/83f52cfc3c788dd6fadd4710eabbfa055a42fdd7" alt=""
Zimbabwe and other African nations are set to face increased pressure on their health, education, and development sectors following major international aid cuts by the United Kingdom (UK) and Netherlands.
The UK government has decided to slash its UKAID budget from 0.5% of GDP to 0.3%, diverting the funds to boost military spending by £13.4 billion annually. The move, described as a "painful choice," was announced by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as part of efforts to strengthen Britain's defense against global security threats, particularly in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's ongoing war in Ukraine.
"That is not an announcement I am happy to make," Starmer told Parliament.
"We will do everything we can to return to a world where that is not the case, and rebuild a capability on development, but at times like this the defense and security of the British people must always come first."
Zimbabwe, despite not being a Commonwealth member, has been a recipient of UK aid, receiving over £31 million from the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) between 2024 and 2025. UKAID funding has supported over two million women and babies in accessing maternal and neonatal healthcare, while also assisting Zimbabwe in preparing for potential health crises.
With the UK cutting its aid budget and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) also scaling down operations under Donald Trump's recent foreign policy stance, concerns are mounting over the fate of African health and education programs that have long depended on Western funding.
Beyond the UK, the Netherlands has also announced a major shift in its development funding policy. On Tuesday, Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Reinette Klever stated that all aid programs must now serve the Netherlands’ own interests, such as boosting trade, enhancing security, and reducing migration.
"All the programs we fund must contribute directly to our own interests: promoting trade, enhancing security, and reducing migration," Klever said.
As a result, funds previously allocated to civil society organizations (CSOs) in Africa will now be redirected to North Africa and the Middle East, with a focus on preventing migration to the Netherlands and strengthening border security.
The withdrawal of key donors threatens to cripple Zimbabwe’s already struggling health and education sectors, both of which rely heavily on foreign assistance. UKAID has played a crucial role in funding hospitals, clinics, and humanitarian programs, benefiting millions of vulnerable Zimbabweans. The cuts could also affect cash transfer programs that support people at risk of hunger.
Since 2014, UKAID has assisted over 9.8 million people globally through direct funding or partnerships with CSOs. However, with funding priorities shifting towards military and security interests, developing nations may be forced to find alternative sources of support.
Analysts warn that Zimbabwe and other African countries must now take urgent steps to strengthen domestic revenue generation and public service funding to mitigate the impact of shrinking international aid.
The UK government has decided to slash its UKAID budget from 0.5% of GDP to 0.3%, diverting the funds to boost military spending by £13.4 billion annually. The move, described as a "painful choice," was announced by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as part of efforts to strengthen Britain's defense against global security threats, particularly in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's ongoing war in Ukraine.
"That is not an announcement I am happy to make," Starmer told Parliament.
"We will do everything we can to return to a world where that is not the case, and rebuild a capability on development, but at times like this the defense and security of the British people must always come first."
Zimbabwe, despite not being a Commonwealth member, has been a recipient of UK aid, receiving over £31 million from the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) between 2024 and 2025. UKAID funding has supported over two million women and babies in accessing maternal and neonatal healthcare, while also assisting Zimbabwe in preparing for potential health crises.
With the UK cutting its aid budget and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) also scaling down operations under Donald Trump's recent foreign policy stance, concerns are mounting over the fate of African health and education programs that have long depended on Western funding.
Beyond the UK, the Netherlands has also announced a major shift in its development funding policy. On Tuesday, Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Reinette Klever stated that all aid programs must now serve the Netherlands’ own interests, such as boosting trade, enhancing security, and reducing migration.
"All the programs we fund must contribute directly to our own interests: promoting trade, enhancing security, and reducing migration," Klever said.
As a result, funds previously allocated to civil society organizations (CSOs) in Africa will now be redirected to North Africa and the Middle East, with a focus on preventing migration to the Netherlands and strengthening border security.
The withdrawal of key donors threatens to cripple Zimbabwe’s already struggling health and education sectors, both of which rely heavily on foreign assistance. UKAID has played a crucial role in funding hospitals, clinics, and humanitarian programs, benefiting millions of vulnerable Zimbabweans. The cuts could also affect cash transfer programs that support people at risk of hunger.
Since 2014, UKAID has assisted over 9.8 million people globally through direct funding or partnerships with CSOs. However, with funding priorities shifting towards military and security interests, developing nations may be forced to find alternative sources of support.
Analysts warn that Zimbabwe and other African countries must now take urgent steps to strengthen domestic revenue generation and public service funding to mitigate the impact of shrinking international aid.
Source - NewZimbabwe