Opinion / Columnist
Zanu-PF succession battle: why you must be concerned
9 hrs ago | Views
SHOULD the current succession debate in Zanu-PF be a concern for the church and the rest of the population, even those not affiliated to the ruling or opposition parties?
The issue of succession in Zanu-PF has always been a contentious one, often intensifying as the end of an incumbent's term or retirement nears. We saw this during Robert Mugabe's later years, when it became clear that leadership transition was inevitable.
Some argue that this is purely an internal party matter, irrelevant to those outside Zanu-PF or even to those unaffiliated with any political party in Zimbabwe. I strongly disagree with this simplistic view and offer four key reasons why this issue affects the entire nation.
Succession in Zanu-PF is linked to Zimbabwe's democratic struggles. Zanu-PF has historically operated under a "guided" internal democracy, where succession debates are shaped by the interests of the incumbent rather than by democratic principles. This pattern has influenced opposition politics as well, where leaders such as Morgan Tsvangirai and later Nelson Chamisa made succession decisions that were not necessarily rooted in party constitutions.
The failure to establish strong internal democratic traditions—both in the ruling party and the opposition—reflects a broader national governance challenge. If the main political actors are not able to establish succession processes determined by their own laws, but by other factors, the citizens suffer the consequences of poor leadership.
The role of the military in politics remains unresolved. The last time Zanu-PF faced a major succession crisis, it was resolved not through democratic processes but by military intervention. Mugabe's long-standing assertion that "politics leads the gun" was disproven when the army played a decisive role in forcing his exit. This underscores a critical national question: What is the role of the military in our political system?
Each succession crisis in Zanu-PF revives this unresolved issue, making it a matter of national concern.
The succession issue also highlights cronyism, ethnicity, and tribalism. Zanu-PF's internal succession struggles often expose the dangers of cronyism, ethnic favouritism, and tribalism—threats that extend beyond the party and into national unity.
Towards the end of his rule, Mugabe was accused of positioning his wife, Grace, to benefit financially and politically while allegedly favouring a Zezuru successor. In opposition politics, similar questions arose: Did Morgan Tsvangirai, before his death, instruct that Nelson Chamisa (a Karanga) should take over instead of Thokozani Khupe (a Ndebele), despite constitutional provisions to the contrary?
These succession debates reveal a broader problem—appointments based on patronage, ethnicity, or personal connections rather than merit and constitutionalism.
Then comes the problem of personalised politics. In both ruling and opposition parties, political loyalty is often tied to individuals rather than to principles, institutions, or policies. This personalisation of politics stifles open debate and discourages the development of strong, institutionalised governance. When political leadership is built around individuals rather than democratic frameworks, mediocrity thrives, and national progress suffers.
You may ask, why does all this matter to the nation? For the reasons outlined above, Zanu-PF's internal succession challenges are not just party issues; they are national issues. How succession is handled impacts democratic governance, national unity, civil-military relations, and the quality of leadership in Zimbabwe as a whole. Addressing these challenges requires a national conversation, not just an internal party discussion.
The Bible offers wisdom on leadership transitions. Consider Joshua's transition from Moses: "Now it came to pass, a long time after the Lord had given rest to Israel from all their enemies round about, that Joshua was old, advanced in age. And Joshua called for all Israel, for their elders, for their heads, for their judges, and for their officers, and said to them: ‘I am old, advanced in age… Therefore, be very courageous to keep and to do all that is written in the Book of the Law of Moses…'" (Joshua 23:1-6)
From this transition, we learn four key lessons:
♦️ The incumbent voluntarily facilitated the succession process, recognising that his time was up and making sure it was orderly.
♦️ The process involved broad consultation with key national stakeholders, not just a few members of the inner circle.
♦️ Succession was anchored in the law (constitution), ensuring legitimacy.
♦️ Unity was built on a shared national vision and the equitable distribution of resources.
These principles could inform Zimbabwe's succession process, transforming it from being a crisis-prone struggle into an opportunity for renewal and national progress.
We pray that God guides us.
Reverend Kenneth Mtata is the programmes director for the World Council of Churches
The issue of succession in Zanu-PF has always been a contentious one, often intensifying as the end of an incumbent's term or retirement nears. We saw this during Robert Mugabe's later years, when it became clear that leadership transition was inevitable.
Some argue that this is purely an internal party matter, irrelevant to those outside Zanu-PF or even to those unaffiliated with any political party in Zimbabwe. I strongly disagree with this simplistic view and offer four key reasons why this issue affects the entire nation.
Succession in Zanu-PF is linked to Zimbabwe's democratic struggles. Zanu-PF has historically operated under a "guided" internal democracy, where succession debates are shaped by the interests of the incumbent rather than by democratic principles. This pattern has influenced opposition politics as well, where leaders such as Morgan Tsvangirai and later Nelson Chamisa made succession decisions that were not necessarily rooted in party constitutions.
The failure to establish strong internal democratic traditions—both in the ruling party and the opposition—reflects a broader national governance challenge. If the main political actors are not able to establish succession processes determined by their own laws, but by other factors, the citizens suffer the consequences of poor leadership.
The role of the military in politics remains unresolved. The last time Zanu-PF faced a major succession crisis, it was resolved not through democratic processes but by military intervention. Mugabe's long-standing assertion that "politics leads the gun" was disproven when the army played a decisive role in forcing his exit. This underscores a critical national question: What is the role of the military in our political system?
Each succession crisis in Zanu-PF revives this unresolved issue, making it a matter of national concern.
The succession issue also highlights cronyism, ethnicity, and tribalism. Zanu-PF's internal succession struggles often expose the dangers of cronyism, ethnic favouritism, and tribalism—threats that extend beyond the party and into national unity.
Towards the end of his rule, Mugabe was accused of positioning his wife, Grace, to benefit financially and politically while allegedly favouring a Zezuru successor. In opposition politics, similar questions arose: Did Morgan Tsvangirai, before his death, instruct that Nelson Chamisa (a Karanga) should take over instead of Thokozani Khupe (a Ndebele), despite constitutional provisions to the contrary?
These succession debates reveal a broader problem—appointments based on patronage, ethnicity, or personal connections rather than merit and constitutionalism.
Then comes the problem of personalised politics. In both ruling and opposition parties, political loyalty is often tied to individuals rather than to principles, institutions, or policies. This personalisation of politics stifles open debate and discourages the development of strong, institutionalised governance. When political leadership is built around individuals rather than democratic frameworks, mediocrity thrives, and national progress suffers.
You may ask, why does all this matter to the nation? For the reasons outlined above, Zanu-PF's internal succession challenges are not just party issues; they are national issues. How succession is handled impacts democratic governance, national unity, civil-military relations, and the quality of leadership in Zimbabwe as a whole. Addressing these challenges requires a national conversation, not just an internal party discussion.
The Bible offers wisdom on leadership transitions. Consider Joshua's transition from Moses: "Now it came to pass, a long time after the Lord had given rest to Israel from all their enemies round about, that Joshua was old, advanced in age. And Joshua called for all Israel, for their elders, for their heads, for their judges, and for their officers, and said to them: ‘I am old, advanced in age… Therefore, be very courageous to keep and to do all that is written in the Book of the Law of Moses…'" (Joshua 23:1-6)
From this transition, we learn four key lessons:
♦️ The incumbent voluntarily facilitated the succession process, recognising that his time was up and making sure it was orderly.
♦️ The process involved broad consultation with key national stakeholders, not just a few members of the inner circle.
♦️ Succession was anchored in the law (constitution), ensuring legitimacy.
♦️ Unity was built on a shared national vision and the equitable distribution of resources.
These principles could inform Zimbabwe's succession process, transforming it from being a crisis-prone struggle into an opportunity for renewal and national progress.
We pray that God guides us.
Reverend Kenneth Mtata is the programmes director for the World Council of Churches
Source - zimlive
All articles and letters published on Bulawayo24 have been independently written by members of Bulawayo24's community. The views of users published on Bulawayo24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Bulawayo24. Bulawayo24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.
