News / National
Chamisa rules out backing another military coup
2 hrs ago |
116 Views
Former Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) leader Nelson Chamisa has publicly declared that he would not support another military intervention in Zimbabwe, signaling that he would not back any coup attempt against President Emmerson Mnangagwa.
In a post on social media, Chamisa said he would not be made to "write Paper 2" again, a phrase widely interpreted as a reference to the opposition's role during the dramatic events of November 2017, when the military stepped in and removed former President Robert Mugabe from office.
The remark has sparked political debate, with many observers viewing it as Chamisa's clearest indication yet that he does not support military involvement in resolving political disputes.
The phrase "write Paper 2" has become a popular political euphemism in Zimbabwe, often used to suggest a repeat of a previous action or event. In this context, it is understood to refer to the opposition's perceived support for the military-assisted transition that ended Mugabe's nearly four-decade rule.
The November 2017 intervention saw the Zimbabwe Defence Forces place Mugabe under house arrest and facilitate a political process that culminated in Mnangagwa assuming the presidency. While the military denied it was carrying out a coup, the events were widely regarded internationally as a military takeover.
Chamisa's latest comments suggest a shift towards constitutional and democratic processes as the preferred route for political change. Although he did not directly mention Mnangagwa or any specific political developments, his statement has been interpreted as a rejection of any future attempts to remove a sitting government through military action.
The remarks come amid continued speculation in some political circles about Zimbabwe's future political trajectory, with opposition supporters and critics alike closely scrutinising Chamisa's position on issues of governance and democratic transition.
By distancing himself from the events of 2017 and declaring that he will not "write Paper 2" again, Chamisa appears to be emphasizing that any political change in Zimbabwe should occur through constitutional means rather than military intervention.
In a post on social media, Chamisa said he would not be made to "write Paper 2" again, a phrase widely interpreted as a reference to the opposition's role during the dramatic events of November 2017, when the military stepped in and removed former President Robert Mugabe from office.
The remark has sparked political debate, with many observers viewing it as Chamisa's clearest indication yet that he does not support military involvement in resolving political disputes.
The phrase "write Paper 2" has become a popular political euphemism in Zimbabwe, often used to suggest a repeat of a previous action or event. In this context, it is understood to refer to the opposition's perceived support for the military-assisted transition that ended Mugabe's nearly four-decade rule.
The November 2017 intervention saw the Zimbabwe Defence Forces place Mugabe under house arrest and facilitate a political process that culminated in Mnangagwa assuming the presidency. While the military denied it was carrying out a coup, the events were widely regarded internationally as a military takeover.
Chamisa's latest comments suggest a shift towards constitutional and democratic processes as the preferred route for political change. Although he did not directly mention Mnangagwa or any specific political developments, his statement has been interpreted as a rejection of any future attempts to remove a sitting government through military action.
The remarks come amid continued speculation in some political circles about Zimbabwe's future political trajectory, with opposition supporters and critics alike closely scrutinising Chamisa's position on issues of governance and democratic transition.
By distancing himself from the events of 2017 and declaring that he will not "write Paper 2" again, Chamisa appears to be emphasizing that any political change in Zimbabwe should occur through constitutional means rather than military intervention.
Source - online
Join the discussion
Loading comments…
