News / National
Alleged drug dealer seeks investigation findings
5 hrs ago | Views
Tyron Pigors Siegfried, a suspected drug dealer arrested for illegal possession of 1.6 kilogrammes of crystal methamphetamine valued at approximately US$6,000, has filed a court application demanding the State provide a detailed summary of investigation findings before his trial commences.
Siegfried faces charges of unlawful possession and dealing in dangerous drugs, specifically crystal methamphetamine.
Court records indicate that police apprehended Siegfried at his home in Matsheumhlope suburb, Bulawayo, following surveillance operations that began in February this year. Acting on intelligence, detectives raided his residence, recovering crystal meth concealed in multiple containers, including a biscuit box, a sneaker box, a dictionary-shaped safe, and a large blue metal trunk, all found in his bedroom. Police also seized measuring scales alleged to have been used for packaging the drugs.
Through his legal representative, Mr Tinashe Dzipe of Morris Davis and Co, Siegfried contends that the State is constitutionally obligated to provide sufficient particulars of the charges to enable adequate defence preparation.
"Such particulars shall be delivered to the accused or to his legal representative free of charge and shall be recorded," Mr Dzipe submitted in court.
He argued that the information furnished so far was insufficient for Siegfried to enter a meaningful plea or prepare his defence. Key documents and evidence have reportedly not been disclosed, including the search warrant, field drug test results, a Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) Form 36 (Application for Scientific Examination), and a packing note outlining the chain of custody for the seized drugs.
"There is information contained in the State outline and witness statements, and also raised during the bail hearing, which was withheld from the applicant," the lawyer stated.
The defence further highlighted that Siegfried has not been provided with the report of a preliminary drug test conducted at the scene, which reportedly tested positive for methamphetamine, amphetamine, and methylenedioxy-methamphetamine.
Additionally, Siegfried demands access to a CID Cyber Lab report related to his confiscated Samsung S23 Ultra mobile phone. The defence argues that this forensic report is critical to determining whether any digital evidence links Siegfried to the alleged offence.
Mr Dzipe warned that withholding the requested documents would violate Siegfried's constitutional right to a fair hearing, as guaranteed under the Constitution.
"Where the State chooses to withhold information, the accused is often forced to construct a defence during the course of the trial, thereby creating the risk of the court drawing adverse inferences against him for failing to disclose material facts earlier," he submitted.
The court has yet to rule on Siegfried's application as the matter progresses.
Siegfried faces charges of unlawful possession and dealing in dangerous drugs, specifically crystal methamphetamine.
Court records indicate that police apprehended Siegfried at his home in Matsheumhlope suburb, Bulawayo, following surveillance operations that began in February this year. Acting on intelligence, detectives raided his residence, recovering crystal meth concealed in multiple containers, including a biscuit box, a sneaker box, a dictionary-shaped safe, and a large blue metal trunk, all found in his bedroom. Police also seized measuring scales alleged to have been used for packaging the drugs.
Through his legal representative, Mr Tinashe Dzipe of Morris Davis and Co, Siegfried contends that the State is constitutionally obligated to provide sufficient particulars of the charges to enable adequate defence preparation.
"Such particulars shall be delivered to the accused or to his legal representative free of charge and shall be recorded," Mr Dzipe submitted in court.
He argued that the information furnished so far was insufficient for Siegfried to enter a meaningful plea or prepare his defence. Key documents and evidence have reportedly not been disclosed, including the search warrant, field drug test results, a Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) Form 36 (Application for Scientific Examination), and a packing note outlining the chain of custody for the seized drugs.
"There is information contained in the State outline and witness statements, and also raised during the bail hearing, which was withheld from the applicant," the lawyer stated.
The defence further highlighted that Siegfried has not been provided with the report of a preliminary drug test conducted at the scene, which reportedly tested positive for methamphetamine, amphetamine, and methylenedioxy-methamphetamine.
Additionally, Siegfried demands access to a CID Cyber Lab report related to his confiscated Samsung S23 Ultra mobile phone. The defence argues that this forensic report is critical to determining whether any digital evidence links Siegfried to the alleged offence.
Mr Dzipe warned that withholding the requested documents would violate Siegfried's constitutional right to a fair hearing, as guaranteed under the Constitution.
"Where the State chooses to withhold information, the accused is often forced to construct a defence during the course of the trial, thereby creating the risk of the court drawing adverse inferences against him for failing to disclose material facts earlier," he submitted.
The court has yet to rule on Siegfried's application as the matter progresses.
Source - the herald
